Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Tezulaş, Emre; Yıldız, Çoşkun; Evren, Buket; Özkan, Yasemin

doi:10.1111/jerd.12389

Cited by 29 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent clinical studies showed higher predictability and fewer debonding complications for single retainer RBFPDs compared with the two retainer design in the anterior region …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agenesis of a maxillary lateral incisor associated with bilateral canine inclusions: A noninvasive multidisciplinary approach

Savi

Crescini

Manfredi

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The treatment of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors is often complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach, which demands continuous collaboration among the different specialists involved in the rehabilitation. In young patients, implant therapy or the preparation of intact teeth for fixed prostheses is not indicated. Clinical Considerations Two complex cases of double maxillary canine inclusion were treated with combined surgical, orthodontic, and conservative prosthetic treatments. Orthodontic therapy allowed the creation of the necessary interocclusal space to fabricate the all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures without the preparation of the abutment teeth. Conclusions Carefully planned and meticulously executed orthodontic and prosthetic therapies allowed for a noninvasive rehabilitation of patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis. Clinical Significance This article provides clinicians with a noninvasive solution for agenesis of lateral incisors associated with canine inclusions. Indications for the choice of material of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures are discussed and presented.

show abstract

“…Recent clinical studies showed higher predictability and fewer debonding complications for single retainer RBFPDs compared with the two retainer design in the anterior region …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agenesis of a maxillary lateral incisor associated with bilateral canine inclusions: A noninvasive multidisciplinary approach

Savi

Crescini

Manfredi

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs had a better clinical retention than fixed-fixed RBFPDs because a cantilever RBB eliminates adverse interabutment stresses associated with fixed-fixed designs. [8][9][10]…”

Section: Cantilever Rbb Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cantilever Resin-bonded Bridge Design: A Review

Ravichandran¹

2020

Journal of Scientific Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) were first described in the 1970s. The present forms of RBBs have evolved from many significant developments. Splinting of periodontally compromised teeth was the initial objective of these prostheses. Their use eventually expanded to replace missing anterior teeth. Cantilever resin-bonded fixed partial denture (RBFPD) is a conservative alternative approach to fixed-fixed partial dentures in replacing missing tooth and should be included as a treatment option wherever possible. For fixed replacement of missing teeth, RBBs can be considered to give a reversible, minimally invasive, esthetic, and predictable restorative outcome in spite of many problems such as debonds. Two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs had a better clinical retention than fixed-fixed RBFPDs because a cantilever RBB eliminates adverse interabutment stresses associated with fixed-fixed designs. The longevity of RBBs is influenced by numerous factors. To achieve successful long-term survival, careful case selection and consideration of various variables like materials used and occlusal protection are crucial.

show abstract

“…A RBFDP may be a preferable tooth replacement to an implant restoration but is not without potential complications. The option of a resin‐retained cantilever design shows good long‐term survival rates, but there remains a potential for rotational relapse of the canine and concomitant esthetic compromise. For that reason, Forgie et al recommends retentive wings on both the central incisor and canine on patients postorthodontics (Figure A through E).…”

Section: Resin Bonded Fixed Dental Prosthesis (Rbfdp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…D, Metal alloy retentive wings for a RBFDP were made for both abutment teeth to stabilize teeth positions. E, The RBFDP replaced the missing lateral incisor and a veneer restored the peg lateral incisor for esthetic continuity rates, 49,50 When developing space for a RBFDP, the orthodontist and restorative dentist should, if possible, ensure there is adequate intercoronal and interradicular space for a future implant, 51,53 mitigating the arduous task of reinstituting orthodontics if retreatment is undertaken in the future (Figure 4A through E). 54 If implant spacing cannot be achieved, a RBFDP may be the only viable option ( Figure 5A and B).…”

Section: Complications and Remediationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The treatment dilemma of missing maxillary lateral incisors‐Part I: Canine substitution and resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses

Priest

2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Clinicians are faced with three common treatment options for the high frequency of missing or lost maxillary lateral incisors; canine substitution, a resin‐bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDP), or a dental implant. A review of current data and guidelines for treatment provide new insight into making the most appropriate selection. Overview The incidence of maxillary incisor agenesis and loss is prevalent. Both canine substitution and RBFDPs exhibit esthetic and functional advantages and disadvantages. Conclusions Most missing lateral incisors are detected at an early age as a result of congenital absence; therefore, proper treatment of these young patients is essential. Both canine substitution and RBFDPs can provide long‐term success and esthetics when carefully executed. The decision should be based on the patient's expectations, their clinical presentation, cost, and the team's ability to provide the best long‐term esthetic and functional prognosis for a specific patient. Clinical significance Patients regularly present for treatment of missing and lost maxillary lateral incisors. The functional and esthetic aspects of canine substitution and a RBFDP should be clearly understood relative to the clinical parameters of each patient prior to treatment.

show abstract

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Cited by 29 publications

References 36 publications

Agenesis of a maxillary lateral incisor associated with bilateral canine inclusions: A noninvasive multidisciplinary approach

Agenesis of a maxillary lateral incisor associated with bilateral canine inclusions: A noninvasive multidisciplinary approach

Cantilever Resin-bonded Bridge Design: A Review

The treatment dilemma of missing maxillary lateral incisors‐Part I: Canine substitution and resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About