Pathological and anatomic features of high-risk or vulnerable plaques have been reviewed extensively in the literature.1 Briefly, high-risk plaques are characterized by the presence of large plaque burden and necrotic cores that are covered by intensely inflamed, thin fibrous caps; these lesions are typically positively (or outwardly) remodeled.1 Most of the anatomic features of high-risk plaques are identifiable in vivo using invasive and noninvasive imaging modalities, such as intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and coronary computed tomography angiography. Although difficult, inflammation has been identified by intravascular demonstration of thermal heterogeneity and targeting of macrophages by positron emission tomography. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Studies over the past 2 decades have demonstrated that high-risk plaques are usually responsible for most acute coronary syndromes (ACS).1,14-17 However, despite extensive interest and excitement regarding the potential of identifying high-risk lesions, plaque characteristics that have been shown to be associated with high-risk plaques have demonstrated a poor positive predictive value for identifying future events.
18For more than a decade, the cardiology community has believed that most ACS arise from ruptures of mildly stenotic plaques and that most major adverse events occur independent of the plaque size and the degree of luminal stenosis.
19This belief emanated from retrospective studies of patients in whom coronary angiography had been performed months to years before myocardial infarction (MI); the lesions responsible for the subsequent infarct were angiographically mild in most cases, that is, at baseline <50% diameter stenosis compared with the adjacent reference vessel lumen. [20][21][22][23][24] Pathologically, although some coronary events may be caused by rupture of plaques with a mild degree of luminal narrowing, 17 most culprit lesions at the time of the acute event are critically occlusive.