2000
DOI: 10.1002/oti.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical reasoning and the occupational therapy curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the analysis of many occupational therapy fieldwork experiences revealed that clinicians commonly devote the bulk of their treatment time to "client factors," even though research has indicated that component-driven therapy versus occupation-based therapy is ineffective in achieving meaningful and functional outcomes (Trombly, 1995). Perhaps this discrepancy between what is being taught in the students' didactic education and what is being modeled for students in the clinical world, is one of the key explanations for why novice therapists are having difficulty transferring knowledge into practice and are limited in their ability to provide client-centered practice (Fleming, 1991;Liu, Chan, & Hui-Chan, 2000;Unsworth, 2001). Neistadt, Wight, and Mulligan (1998) defined clinical reasoning as the thought process that clinicians use in practice that enables them to individualize client treatment, facilitate functional performance, and create positive outcomes for clients.…”
Section: Client-centered Carementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the analysis of many occupational therapy fieldwork experiences revealed that clinicians commonly devote the bulk of their treatment time to "client factors," even though research has indicated that component-driven therapy versus occupation-based therapy is ineffective in achieving meaningful and functional outcomes (Trombly, 1995). Perhaps this discrepancy between what is being taught in the students' didactic education and what is being modeled for students in the clinical world, is one of the key explanations for why novice therapists are having difficulty transferring knowledge into practice and are limited in their ability to provide client-centered practice (Fleming, 1991;Liu, Chan, & Hui-Chan, 2000;Unsworth, 2001). Neistadt, Wight, and Mulligan (1998) defined clinical reasoning as the thought process that clinicians use in practice that enables them to individualize client treatment, facilitate functional performance, and create positive outcomes for clients.…”
Section: Client-centered Carementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unsworth (2001) found that not only did expert therapists use more clinical reasoning overall but were also more confident, client-centered with their reasoning, and were able to change the direction of therapy more easily than the novice therapists. Regrettably, the literature suggests that as novice therapists tend to be most comfortable with procedural reasoning, they tend to think at the disease or disability level and focus on the problems of the physical body as opposed to the complexities of client-centered practice (Liu et al, 2000), which reinforces the tendency toward treating "client factors. "…”
Section: Client-centered Carementioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been described as the method by which genuine client-centred practice is accomplished (Atkins and Ersser, 2000). Critical reasoning plays an essential role in the ability to transfer basic knowledge into practice (Liu, 2000), which makes the development of critical reasoning skills a necessary focus in OT education. Maudsley and Strivens (2000) suggest that just as there are no fi xed rules for solving clinical problems, there is no standard approach for facilitating critical reasoning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search for "occupational therapy" and "curriculum" yielded results that addressed service learning ethics (DeMars, Fleming, & Benham, 1991), clinical reasoning (Liu, Chan, & Hui-Chan, 2000), service learning (Baum, 2007), application of the OT Model Curriculum…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%