2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Relevance of Impaired Physiological Assessment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis including studies with both post-PCI invasive FFR/iFR and post-PCI angiography-derived FFR values showed that impaired post-PCI physiology assessment values are related to increased adverse cardiac events [ 38 ]. Using the same primary outcome as in our study, the authors reported a twofold increase in adverse cardiovascular events in patients with lower post-PCI invasive or angiography-derived FFR values, whereas our study showed a fourfold higher risk in patients with lower angiography-derived FFR values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent meta-analysis including studies with both post-PCI invasive FFR/iFR and post-PCI angiography-derived FFR values showed that impaired post-PCI physiology assessment values are related to increased adverse cardiac events [ 38 ]. Using the same primary outcome as in our study, the authors reported a twofold increase in adverse cardiovascular events in patients with lower post-PCI invasive or angiography-derived FFR values, whereas our study showed a fourfold higher risk in patients with lower angiography-derived FFR values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same primary outcome as in our study, the authors reported a twofold increase in adverse cardiovascular events in patients with lower post-PCI invasive or angiography-derived FFR values, whereas our study showed a fourfold higher risk in patients with lower angiography-derived FFR values. This difference could be attributed firstly to the inclusion of neutral FFR studies in the meta-analysis by Griffioen et al [ 38 ]. Secondly, in contrast to Griffioen et al we included two large QFR studies that reported significantly higher risks of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with lower post-PCI QFR values [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there were 15 studies that included heart failure as a component of MACE. [35][36][37] Zhou's study included 3154 patients with stable CHD who were followed for 24 months. This study showed that endothelin-1 levels were associated with major cardiovascular events in CHD patients who were not revascularized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%