2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1260-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical reliability of closed techniques and comparison with open strategies to achieve union at the docking site

Abstract: Purpose This retrospective review follows 31 tibial nonunions to compare union at the docking site using closed versus open strategies. In this cohort of patients, all but five were infected nonunions. Methods Thirteen patients initially treated with single compression were compared with 18 patients treated by open revision of the docking site. In the single compression group, an average of 6.5 cm of bone was resected and index lengthening was 2.04. In the open revision group, a mean of 9.4 cm was resected and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean ISS was 23 6 4.9 (range, scores of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean ISS was 23 6 4.9 (range, scores of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 The TSF was newly applied frame because of the hospital's policy that disallows the recycling of frames.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Union at the docking site can be hastened and cross-section area widened using iliac crest bone grafting 50. Injection of bone marrow aspirate at the nonunion site helps if iliac crest graft sites are exhausted.…”
Section: Docking Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 This bone transport technique is used for treatment of a variety of conditions leading to bone loss. [3][4][5] The traditional Ilizarov approach consisted of simple compression of these soft tissues after bone transport was completed; others have added periods of distraction to stimulate osteogenesis and increase rates of healing, but this is time-consuming and uncomfortable for the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%