2012
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Research Involving Children: Registration, Completeness, and Publication

Abstract: Results are unavailable for more than half of the studies involving children, revealing a substantial publication bias. Registration and posting of results on ClinicalTrials.gov should be mandatory for all studies involving children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 C o n t a r c o n f i n a n c i a m i e n t o e s t u v o significativamente asociado a la publicación, y no influyeron ni el diseño ni el tipo de presentación, aunque, en este último caso (presentación oral), la ausencia de significación puede deberse a una falta de potencia (p= 0,06). Kleine-Konig 6 y Shamliyan 10 encontraron que los trabajos experimentales y aquellos que se presentaban en forma oral se publicaban más que los observacionales. También Canosa 4 encontró que la presentación oral se asociaba a mayor posibilidad de publicación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…9 C o n t a r c o n f i n a n c i a m i e n t o e s t u v o significativamente asociado a la publicación, y no influyeron ni el diseño ni el tipo de presentación, aunque, en este último caso (presentación oral), la ausencia de significación puede deberse a una falta de potencia (p= 0,06). Kleine-Konig 6 y Shamliyan 10 encontraron que los trabajos experimentales y aquellos que se presentaban en forma oral se publicaban más que los observacionales. También Canosa 4 encontró que la presentación oral se asociaba a mayor posibilidad de publicación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…9 Having received funding was significantly associated with publishing, but design and type of presentation were not; notwithstanding this, for type of presentation (oral), lack of significance may have been due to lack of power (p = 0.06). Kleine-Konig 6 and Shamliyan 10 observed that experimental studies and abstracts presented orally had more chances of publication than observational ones. Canosa 4 also observed that oral presentations were associated with greater chances of publication.…”
Section: T W a S O B S E R V E D T H A T A M O N G Abstract mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less than half of the NIH-funded registered trials are published in a peer-reviewed journal within 30 months of trial completion [17]. Only 29% of completed registered studies involving children and 53% of NIH-funded trials have been published [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research used time-consuming manual searchers of the publications in various subsets of registered studies (i.e., by source of funding [17], study participants [18], and specific health conditions) [19]. In contrast, this paper examines result availability from all studies registered with ClinicalTrials.gov to answer the question: Do existing policies in research registration, publication, and indexing guarantee access to the results?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%