Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series

Konstantinidis, Ioannis; Kumar, Tarun; Kher, Udatta; Stanitsas, Panagiotis; Hinrichs, James E.; Kotsakis, Georgios A.

doi:10.1007/s00784-014-1268-4

Cited by 32 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, only a few of these studies [25–27] reported on alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes and simultaneous implant placement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several clinical studies have demonstrated that titanium meshes can promote the formation of new bone, when positioned before [19–24] or simultaneously with dental implants [25–27]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The proper placement and stabilization of the titanium mesh into the defect site is of fundamental importance for the success of the regenerative therapy [13, 16–18]; one of the difficulties with these membranes can be related to this, particularly in case of simultaneous placement of the implant, for regeneration of small and medium size defects [17, 18, 25–27]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Gomes¹,

Freixas²,

Han³

et al. 2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate horizontal bone gain and implant survival and complication rates in patients treated with titanium meshes placed simultaneously with dental implants and fixed over them. Methods. Twenty-five patients treated with 40 implants and simultaneous guided bone regeneration with titanium meshes (i–Gen®, MegaGen, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea) were selected for inclusion in the present retrospective multicenter study. Primary outcomes were horizontal bone gain and implant survival; secondary outcomes were biological and prosthetic complications. Results. After the removal of titanium meshes, the CBCT evaluation revealed a mean horizontal bone gain of 3.67 mm (±0.89). The most frequent complications were mild postoperative edema (12/25 patients: 48%) and discomfort after surgery (10/25 patients: 40%); these complications were resolved within one week. Titanium mesh exposure occurred in 6 patients (6/25 : 24%): one of these suffered partial loss of the graft and another experienced complete graft loss and implant failure. An implant survival rate of 97.5% (implant-based) and a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 0.43 mm (±0.15) were recorded after 1 year. Conclusions. The horizontal ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes placed simultaneously with dental implants achieved predictable satisfactory results. Prospective randomized controlled trials on a larger sample of patients are required to validate these positive outcomes.

show abstract

“…However, only a few of these studies [25–27] reported on alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes and simultaneous implant placement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several clinical studies have demonstrated that titanium meshes can promote the formation of new bone, when positioned before [19–24] or simultaneously with dental implants [25–27]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Gomes¹,

Freixas²,

Han³

et al. 2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5,25 During the first year after loading, reportedly highly acceptable levels of marginal bone loss were observed on radiographs: 0.50 6 0.26 mm on the mesial side and 0.58 6 0.23 mm on the distal side of implants. 22,26-28 Bone loss can occur after loading, due to maturation and adaptation of the marginal bone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The mean defect height coverage observed in this study (79%) lies within the range of those reported in several clinical GBR studies (75%-81%). 5,6 Although there is considerable evidence for the survival of implants placed in conjunction with GBR, the long-term stability of regenerated buccal bones may differ from that survival rate. 7 It has been shown in clinical studies that a predictable result with GBR requires certain conditions, such as wound stabilization, and space creation and maintenance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous Block Bone Grafting Using “L-Shaped Notch” Preparation in Mandible

Lee¹,

Lee

Lim

et al. 2015

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Stability of contour augmentation of implant‐supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: One‐year cone‐beam computed tomography results of a comparative, randomized, prospective, two‐center clinical study using two different bone grafting techniques in early implant placement

Tsai

Tsao

Wang

et al. 2022

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Early implant placement with contour augmentation could provide support and volume to the hard and soft tissues. Herein, we aimed to ascertain whether freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA) shares with deproteinized bovine bone material (DBBM) the results for esthetic outcomes for anterior teeth and stability of peri‐implant facial bone thickness and height by conducting guided bone regeneration. Methods Forty‐eight patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the control group, autogenous bone chips was used to cover the exposed implant surface, followed by a layer of DBBM. This graft combination was then covered with two layers of collagen membrane. In the test group, the exposed implant surface was covered with FDBA, combined with the collagen membrane. During this study, the hard tissue dimensional changes were measured at 12‐months post‐implant loading by using cone‐beam computed tomography. Results At 12 months postoperatively, all 48 implants were clinically successful. The mean thickness of facial bone walls ranged from 1.6 to 2.45 mm at the three levels of measurement in the control group and ranged from 1.6 to 2.10 mm in the test group. The mean facial vertical bone wall peak (IP‐FC) after loading 1 year presented with values of 0.8 mm (range, 0.0 to 1.25 mm) and 0.5 mm (range, 0.1 to 1.1 mm) coronal to the implant platform in control and test implants, respectively. There were no significant differences in facial bone wall thickness and IP‐FC between groups. Conclusions This study demonstrated that autogenous bone chips plus DBBM or FDBA showed similar outcome of peri‐implant buccal bone stability in early implant placement after 1 year.

show abstract

Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series

Abstract: The handling characteristics of CPS putty may simplify GBR protocol. Implants placed in conjunction with GBR have a very good survival rate after 1 year of follow-up.

Cited by 32 publications

References 17 publications

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Simultaneous Block Bone Grafting Using “L-Shaped Notch” Preparation in Mandible

Stability of contour augmentation of implant‐supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: One‐year cone‐beam computed tomography results of a comparative, randomized, prospective, two‐center clinical study using two different bone grafting techniques in early implant placement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About