2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Results of Maverick Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Two-Year Prospective Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
50
1
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
50
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were on highly selected cases and without equal randomisation to compare the effect of TDR with fusion. Many studies dealing with TDR [4,10,15,23,26,27] include patients with only one symptomatic level causing pain and dysfunction due to DDD, being discographypositive and without spondylosis or facet joint arthritis, the patients sampled thus representing a subgroup of all patients with painful motion segments. Based on these studies, TDR cannot be recommended for a wide group of patients with degenerative problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were on highly selected cases and without equal randomisation to compare the effect of TDR with fusion. Many studies dealing with TDR [4,10,15,23,26,27] include patients with only one symptomatic level causing pain and dysfunction due to DDD, being discographypositive and without spondylosis or facet joint arthritis, the patients sampled thus representing a subgroup of all patients with painful motion segments. Based on these studies, TDR cannot be recommended for a wide group of patients with degenerative problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from retrospective or prospective cohort studies on TDR with different devices have been presented [2,3,7,15,23,26]; however, the long-term mechanical characteristics of the various prostheses have not been entirely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal fusion for DDD is the most common accepted treatment in effort to eliminate abnormal motion and instability at the symptomatic degenerated levels, and thereby reduce or eliminate low-back pain [1,4,7,17]. Artificial total disc replacement (TDR), as an alternative to spinal arthrodesis, is increasingly applied for surgically treating lumbar DDD [30,32,42]. By performing lumbar TDR, it is postulated that the patient's normal intervertebral segment motion is restored and maintained while the adjacent level is prevented from non-physiologic loading and thus the pain is relieved [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHARITÉ i and Mavericki underwent biomechanical testing under controlled conditions [15,16] and, along with the ProDisc \ -L, have shown clinical success in restoring disc height and normal motion [17][18][19][20][21]. While biomechanical testing was performed by Rousseau et al [22] to determine the effect of TDR on instant axis of rotation (IAR) and facet joint forces, no testing has been performed on the ProDisc \ -L to determine its dynamic behavior in restoring joint motion [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%