2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291711002698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical risk assessment rating and all-cause mortality in secondary mental healthcare: the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLAM BRC) Case Register

Abstract: Level of clinician-appraised risk of self-neglect, but not of suicide or violence, predicted all-cause mortality among people receiving specific assessment of risk in a secondary mental health service.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, difficulties with ADL independently predicted all-cause mortality. Together with the null findings with respect to self-harm and aggression, this is consistent with research showing that, in some cohorts, self-neglect may be a stronger predictor of mortality than more obvious risk factors such as suicide or violence [38]. It is also consistent with other research showing that ADL impairment is independently predictive of all-cause mortality among individuals with severe mental illness [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, difficulties with ADL independently predicted all-cause mortality. Together with the null findings with respect to self-harm and aggression, this is consistent with research showing that, in some cohorts, self-neglect may be a stronger predictor of mortality than more obvious risk factors such as suicide or violence [38]. It is also consistent with other research showing that ADL impairment is independently predictive of all-cause mortality among individuals with severe mental illness [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[12][13][14][15] CRIS was approved as a data-set for secondary analysis by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee C (reference 08/H0606/71). Approval for the present study was sought and obtained from the CRIS Oversight Committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive responses can be summed to create total scores, i.e. the higher the score the greater the suicide risk [33]. The most recent full risk assessment was considered for these analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%