Clinical risk management in mental health: a qualitative study of main risks and related organizational management practices

Abstract

BackgroundA scientific understanding of clinical risk management (CRM) in mental health care is essential for building safer health systems and for improving patient safety. While evidence on patient safety and CRM in physical health care has increased, there is limited research on these issues in mental health care. This qualitative study provides an overview of the most important clinical risks in mental health and related organizational management practices.MethodsWe conducted in-depth expert interviews with professionals responsible for CRM in psychiatric hospitals. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed applying qualitative content analysis to thematically sort the identified risks.ResultsThe main concerns for CRM in mental health are a) violence and self-destructive behavior (i.e. protecting patients and staff from other patients, and patients from themselves), b) treatment errors, especially in the process of therapy, and c) risks associated with mental illnesses (e.g. psychosis or depression). This study identified critical differences to CRM in hospitals for physical disorder and challenges specific to CRM in mental health. Firstly, many psychiatric patients do not believe that they are ill and are therefore in hospital against their will. Secondly, staff safety is a much more prominent theme for CRM in mental health care as it is directly related to the specifics of mental illnesses.ConclusionsThe current study contributes to the understanding of patient safety and raises awareness for CRM in mental health. The mental health specific overview of central risks and related organizational management practices offers a valuable basis for CRM development in mental health and an addition to CRM in general.

Risks associated with borrowing and sharing of prescription analgesics among patients observed by pain management physicians in Croatia: a qualitative study

“…Expert interviews are an important instrument for conducting innovative research, taking into consideration the status of the person with whom conversations are carried out, because such research enables the collection of information on subjective experiences and interpretations related to the predefined specialized topic. Semi-structured interview form allows not only a comparison of interviews, but also the inclusion of topics that are not anticipated, but are considered important 16. For the purpose of this study, the physicians were coded with the first 15 English alphabets (A–O).…”

Adverse events in veterans affairs inpatient psychiatric units: Staff perspectives on contributing and protective factors

“…8,9 These and other studies have also identified some of the patient, 7 provider and unit 5 factors that contribute to causing the events. For example, a recent Finnish study, comprised of semi-structured interviews with nurses in two psychiatric hospitals noted the crucial role of the care environment and adequate staffing resources.…”

A lack of therapeutic engagement and consumer input in acute inpatient care planning limits fully accountable mental health nursing practice

“…Risk in mental health services is usually described as the potential risk of harm to self or others (James, Stewart & Bowers 2012;Stickley & Felton 2006) including through violence (Spector, Zhou & Che 2014). A study by Briner and Manser (2013) found that healthcare professionals identified violence and aggression as the most pertinent risk, while other perceived risks were suicide and absconding. Although the literature suggests that the accurate prediction of risk in psychiatry is impossible (Large et al 2011;Mulder et al 2011;Windfuhr & Kapur 2011), the influence of risk management can lead to discourses and practice that are impacted by a fear of blame (Slemon, Jenkins & Bungary 2017).…”