2020
DOI: 10.1002/uog.22055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical role of lung ultrasound for diagnosis and monitoring of COVID‐19 pneumonia in pregnant women

Abstract: Lung ultrasound has been suggested recently by the Chinese Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group and Italian Academy of Thoracic Ultrasound as an accurate tool to detect lung involvement in COVID‐19. Although chest computed tomography (CT) represents the gold standard to assess lung involvement, with a specificity superior even to that of the nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosis, lung ultrasound examination can be a valid alternative to CT scan, with certain advantages, particularly for pregnant women. Ultrasound … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
171
0
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
171
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The other women are currently followed-up in our center: one is admitted for preeclampsia with no respiratory symptoms (currently 35 weeks of gestational age), two women have been discharged home after having developed respiratory symptoms (currently at 20 and 27 weeks of gestational age, respectively), and one asymptomatic (currently at 18 weeks of gestational age). 4 Clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological details of the two neonates are reported in ►Fig. 1 and ►Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other women are currently followed-up in our center: one is admitted for preeclampsia with no respiratory symptoms (currently 35 weeks of gestational age), two women have been discharged home after having developed respiratory symptoms (currently at 20 and 27 weeks of gestational age, respectively), and one asymptomatic (currently at 18 weeks of gestational age). 4 Clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological details of the two neonates are reported in ►Fig. 1 and ►Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, 24 studies, including a total of 324 pregnant women with COVID-19, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. These comprised nine case series 11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] , published between 4 March 2020 and 28 April 2020, and 15 case reports [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] , published between 25 March 2020 and 28 April 2020 ( 35 1 I r a n 2 7 1 0 3 0+ 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Kelly (2020) 36 1 U S A N R 1 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lee (2020) 37 1 Korea 28 1 0 37 + 6 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Lowe (2020) 38 1 Australia 31 1 0 40 + 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Schnettler (2020) 39 1 reported on a total of 295 pregnant patients 11,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26] . Of these, 211 (71.5%) cases had laboratory-confirmed and 84 (28.5%) had clinically diagnosed COVID-19.…”
Section: Figure 1 Summarizes the Selection Of Articles For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 211 (71.5%) cases had laboratory-confirmed and 84 (28.5%) had clinically diagnosed COVID-19. The 15 case reports [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] included a total of 20 pregnant patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We recorded data related to maternal and perinatal characteristics, and the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 at admission, including laboratory testing, treatment received and maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcome.…”
Section: Figure 1 Summarizes the Selection Of Articles For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lung ultrasound has been suggested as a useful tool to detect lung involvement during COVID-19, particularly desirable for pregnant women. [1][2][3] We developed a specific single day training program to provide gynecologists/obstetricians, already skilled in ultrasound examination, the theoretical background for the recognition of the main lung ultrasound patterns. Feasibility of the program and its effectiveness by comparing the number of correct answers in pre and post-training results were evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%