2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Safety of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware: Large Case Series and Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a small amount of signal loss at the DBS leads in low SAR images, similar to that at high-SAR imaging reported in the literature, 2,10 and far less compared with gradient-echo sequences. Gradient echo-based susceptibilityweighted imaging with phase-correction software is a low-SAR sequence and offers high conspicuity for nuclei 22 and works well for preoperative MR imaging for the first DBS.…”
Section: Table 2: Subjective Assessment Of High-and Low-sar Fstir Imasupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a small amount of signal loss at the DBS leads in low SAR images, similar to that at high-SAR imaging reported in the literature, 2,10 and far less compared with gradient-echo sequences. Gradient echo-based susceptibilityweighted imaging with phase-correction software is a low-SAR sequence and offers high conspicuity for nuclei 22 and works well for preoperative MR imaging for the first DBS.…”
Section: Table 2: Subjective Assessment Of High-and Low-sar Fstir Imasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[5][6][7] The deposited RF power (specific absorption rate [SAR]) increases with field strength; and the effective sequences, including FSTIR or T2, pose significant RF heating risk, 8 which has been a potential deterrent for MR imaging of DBS recipients. 9 Although experiences of incident-free routine high-SAR brain MR imaging in large groups of DBS patients have been reported 2,10 and sentinel events, including serious brain injury or death, are very few, 11 some researchers observed 12 a greater incidence of neurologic deficits and tissue edema surrounding electrodes in DBS recipients after routine MR imaging that perhaps were not caused by the surgical procedure itself. Note that local SAR near the contact points at the DBS electrode base is unknown, and because DBS belongs to a class of critical-length implants, the SAR can be an order of magnitude higher.…”
Section: Reported Improved Stnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion recovery and T 2 weighted sequences demonstrate the STN, substantia nigra and the red nucleus adequately. [29][30][31][32][33][34] In our centre, we obtain T 1 weighted, T 2 weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and inversion recovery whole-brain volume acquisitions parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure plane (AC-PC) ( Table 2). Diffusion tensor imaging is also acquired.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few adverse events such as hardware failure, unintended stimulation or heating causing ablation at the electrode tip have been reported. 32,33,[39][40][41][42] By following these guidelines, imaging of the brain in these patients is deemed to be very low risk. The use of any other coil or imaging another part of the body will produce larger induced voltages and may potentially increase the risk of heating.…”
Section: Mr Safety Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety consideration of MRI after DBS placement is important, given the complex interaction between implanted DBS hardware and MRI scanner electromagnetic fields [91]. Serious injury and even death may result from heating, movement, and electrical current in the implanted cables and electrodes.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%