2006
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical scoring systems in cystic fibrosis

Abstract: The first cystic fibrosis (CF) scoring system was published in 1958. Since then, many other scoring systems were developed. Clinical parameters, details about statistical evaluations, and recent strategic uses of scores were identified. Several similar scores aiming to assess chronic illness severity (Shwachman-Kulczycki score and a modification, Cooperman, Berneze-score and the NIH score) have not been evaluated and are out of date, given the changing natural history of CF. Of the current scoring systems, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, accurate temporal/spatial measurements of wt% are necessary to measure treatment efficacy. Current outcome measures rely on days-long observation of patients after treatment 40 , with only recent developments in more rapid measures, on the order of hours 39 . Here, we presented a new quantitative method for sensing mucus wt% that provides real-time measures of respiratory treatment efficacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, accurate temporal/spatial measurements of wt% are necessary to measure treatment efficacy. Current outcome measures rely on days-long observation of patients after treatment 40 , with only recent developments in more rapid measures, on the order of hours 39 . Here, we presented a new quantitative method for sensing mucus wt% that provides real-time measures of respiratory treatment efficacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included both stable CF cases (n = 21) and those with pulmonary exacerbation (n = 6) with Brasfield score ≥7 or Shwachman-Kulczycki score ≤70 (31,32). Age-and sex-matched healthy children attending Pediatrics outpatient department for minor ailments and vaccination were enrolled as controls (n = 27).…”
Section: Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die in der Literatur verbreiteten klinischen CF-Scores sind für die Entscheidung über den richtigen Transplantationszeitpunkt ungeeignet [17]. In früheren Jahren wurden vor allem CF-Patienten mit einer FEV1 unter 30 % des Sollwertes für eine Lungentransplantation evaluiert [18].…”
Section: Spezielle Selektionskriterienunclassified