We thank Dries et al. for their comments 1 on our report, investigating serum versus intrahepatic HCV RNA and the role of liver biopsy in anti-HCV-positive serum PCR-negative individuals. 2 While acknowledging that our study "confirms that complete and lasting elimination of HCV is possible" they had objections to our conclusions viz "negative serum PCR status appears to reflect cleared past exposure in liver" and "neither liver histology nor PCR testing of liver tissue is necessary to diagnose active HCV infection" 223 in serum PCR-negative individuals. We would like to address these issues.Few studies have examined HCV viral clearance; possibly because of the difficulty in identifying individuals who have recovered from HCV infection. Furthermore as liver biopsies are invasive, costly, and potentially risky, they are neither routinely performed nor recommended in PCR-negative individuals. The availability of a large, wellcharacterized, homogenous cohort of serum PCR-negative individuals with proven exposure to HCV (via contaminated anti-D immunoglobulin), in our opinion, provided a rare opportunity to address the important issue of viral clearance. We investigated 96 serum PCRnegative women. None of these women received antiviral treatment, 42 (43.8%) were still RIBA positive, and 6 (6.2%) had elevated ALT levels at the time of presentation. Thirty-three (34%) underwent liver biopsy. Indications for biopsy included elevated ALT levels, strongly positive RIBA-3 tests, and/or symptoms dating from the time of inoculation or a specific patient request for liver biopsy. Our failure to detect HCV RNA in liver tissue using a sensitive nested PCR (Յ100 genomic equivalents/HCV per mL) favors the hypothesis that these individuals have resolved past infection rather than having active chronic HCV. This implies that HCV RNA status in serum reflects the status in liver and indicates that liver biopsy is not justified in anti-HCV-positive serum PCR-negative individuals.Although our cohort was unique, we believe the results of our study can be generalized to other clinical situations. Indeed our results confirm the findings of other smaller studies 3,4 but are in contrast to those of Haydon et al., 5 and Dries et al. 6 We cannot explain the reason for the latter, particularly since the sensitivity of our assay was comparable to that of Haydon et al. Neither, as Dries et al., correctly point out, can we predict which HCV RNA-negative end-of-treatment responders will relapse after treatment, as this issue was not dealt with in our study.McHutchison and the International Hepatitis Intervention Therapy Group 7 have comprehensively addressed this issue in a recent study. Their large study demonstrated that hepatic HCV RNA levels reflected levels of serum HCV RNA and concluded that "little, if any, clinical use is gained by measuring hepatic HCV RNA before or after therapy."In conclusion, we reiterate that our study shows that HCV RNA status in serum reflects the status in liver, that negative serum PCR status appears to reflect c...