2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of Lung-RADS Category 3 Lesions in the National Lung Screening Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the Lung-RADS category ≥ 3 can be confirmed in that the rates of lung cancer in the 6 month follow-up LDCT group and non-group were 7.5% and 3.1%, and specific lung cancer death was 4.0% and 1.0%. 28 Lung-RADS is classified by the type, shape and size of the nodule. In Korea, the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, and tuberculosis can appear as an uncalcified nodule by forming granulomas in the lungs, which can increase the false-positive rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the Lung-RADS category ≥ 3 can be confirmed in that the rates of lung cancer in the 6 month follow-up LDCT group and non-group were 7.5% and 3.1%, and specific lung cancer death was 4.0% and 1.0%. 28 Lung-RADS is classified by the type, shape and size of the nodule. In Korea, the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, and tuberculosis can appear as an uncalcified nodule by forming granulomas in the lungs, which can increase the false-positive rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triệu chứng khó thở chiếm tỷ lệ 49,2% là triệu chứng thường gặp nhất, khác với nghiên cứu của Dae Hee Han khi triệu chứng chủ yếu là phế thũng (33,6%) 6 . Điều này được lý giải do mục đích nghiên cứu của chúng tôi là tất cả các nốt mờ đơn độc, trong khi đó nghiên cứu của Dae Hee Han tập trung vào nốt mờ được phân loại Lung-RADS 3.…”
Section: Luậnunclassified
“…The authors of the article, "Clinical Significance of Lung-RADS Category 3 Lesions in the National Lung Screening Trial" have provided important information in their "mining" of follow-up data from the National Lung Screen Trial (NLST). 1 In the process, however, they were able to evaluate data only on study subjects who had been diagnosed with lung cancer (LC) after 7 years in NLST. Their findings raise concerns on the conduct of cancer screening research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%