1995
DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00087-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical significance of serum S100 in metastatic malignant melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Serial measurements reveal that rising levels predict for progression of disease, and decline and/or lack of increase predict for clinical regression of disease in response to therapy. 18,19,[21][22][23] Our study confirms several of these observations, including the high proportion of patients with disseminated disease having elevations of serum S100B (7/14), the low proportion with elevated levels in the absence of measurable melanoma (1/31), the prognostic predictive value of serum S100B levels for PFS and OS, and the apparent superiority of S100B over LDH as a tumor marker in metastatic melanoma. 19,24 At this time, only LDH is accepted as a tumor marker in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…20 Serial measurements reveal that rising levels predict for progression of disease, and decline and/or lack of increase predict for clinical regression of disease in response to therapy. 18,19,[21][22][23] Our study confirms several of these observations, including the high proportion of patients with disseminated disease having elevations of serum S100B (7/14), the low proportion with elevated levels in the absence of measurable melanoma (1/31), the prognostic predictive value of serum S100B levels for PFS and OS, and the apparent superiority of S100B over LDH as a tumor marker in metastatic melanoma. 19,24 At this time, only LDH is accepted as a tumor marker in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The percentage of patients with increased S100b in stage IV has been quoted as 47.8% (JaÈ ckel et al 1999), 67.9% (Hauschild et al 1999c), 73.9% (Guo et al 1995) and 79.4% (Henze et al 1997). We detected increased serum concentrations in 36 of 62 samples from patients in stage IV (58.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The development of an immunoluminometric assay (LIA-mat Sangtec 100), which was used in the present study, has increased the sensitivity at least tenfold (BonfreÁ r et al 1998). As the stage increases, more patients with serum concentrations above the cut-o level of 15 lg/l or 0.2 lg/l [if a radioimmunoassay (Sangtec IRMA) is used] can be detected (Guo et al 1995;Abraha et al 1997;Seregni et al 1998;KraÈ hn et al 1998;Hauschild et al 1999a, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…131,245 Luminoimmunometric assay is preferred over immunoradiometric because of its lack of radioactivity, good reproducibility, and higher sensitivity compared with immunoradiometric. 131,245 Levels of S-100-b have been found to increase in a stage-dependent manner (stage I/II 0%-12.0%, stage III 8.7%-31%, stage IV 48%-100%), [271][272][273][274][275] correlate with metastatic tumor burden, 275,276 have been proposed to be an independent prognostic factor, [277][278][279][280][281] and decrease in response to therapy. 275,277,282,283 In the detection of early metastatic disease, S-100-b levels have a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 74% to 94% and 83% to 91%, respectively, 265,273,281,284,285 which was found to be more predictive than levels of MIA, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and albumin.…”
Section: Detection Of Minimal Residual Disease In Clinical Stage I Tomentioning
confidence: 99%