2012
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-0494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of the Differentiation Between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in M avium Complex Lung Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
139
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
139
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, during the study period, organisms identified as MAC or M. abscessus were not further subspeciated; nor was colony morphotype routinely reported as "smooth" or "rough." There have been recent data to suggest differing pathogenic potential between M. avium and M. intracellulare (42) and improved treatment response rates with M. bolletii (previously M. massilliense) infection compared with M. abscessus based on the presence of a nonfunctioning erythromycin ribosomal methylase gene (25), which may be a confounding factor that could be contributing to disease progression in our patients.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Unfortunately, during the study period, organisms identified as MAC or M. abscessus were not further subspeciated; nor was colony morphotype routinely reported as "smooth" or "rough." There have been recent data to suggest differing pathogenic potential between M. avium and M. intracellulare (42) and improved treatment response rates with M. bolletii (previously M. massilliense) infection compared with M. abscessus based on the presence of a nonfunctioning erythromycin ribosomal methylase gene (25), which may be a confounding factor that could be contributing to disease progression in our patients.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…intracellulare is a major cause of MAC lung disease in sev- (27). In contrast to the studies from the United States, Queensland, Australia, and Korea, previous studies from Japan reported that M. avium was the predominant cause of MAC lung disease (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been documented that M. intracellulare is the more virulent of the two, and infections of M. intracellulare require more intensive treatment than those of M. avium (1,26). Although there is currently no recommendation for the routine separation of MAC isolates into M. avium and M. intracellulare, it could have important prognostic and therapeutic implications in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%