1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00019-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of Tumor Angiogenesis in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
56
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller studies by others have shown variable associations between clinical outcome and microvessel density. 10,20 Kurban et al 6 showed that VHL mutations resulting in upregulation of HIF1a are associated with decreased microvessel density and low invasive potential, consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Smaller studies by others have shown variable associations between clinical outcome and microvessel density. 10,20 Kurban et al 6 showed that VHL mutations resulting in upregulation of HIF1a are associated with decreased microvessel density and low invasive potential, consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An interesting observation is that Lim1 silencing in tumors of human CCC-bearing nude mice did not affect tumor vascularization. It should be noted, however, that reports dealing with the prognostic value of vascularisation in human CCC have shown either no effect on patient survival, better survival, or worse prognosis (MacLennan and Bostwick, 1995;Nativ et al, 1998;Imao et al, 2004;Yao et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier studies, MVD was used as a parameter for angiogenesis in RCC and evaluated as a possible prognostic marker, however leading to conflicting results Nativ et al, 1998;Rioux-Leclercq et al, 2001;Sabo et al, 2001). To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the fraction of proliferating ECs (ECP%) is investigated within RCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%