2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical study of laminar resorption: Part 1 – Factors affecting laminar resorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in imaging have resulted in earlier detection of laminar resorption. Avadhanam et al ( 84 ) found that 40% of all cases of laminar resorption were detected in the first year of follow-up and 66% of cases were found within 3 years of OOKP surgery. They also discovered that laminar thickness did not affect the onset or progression of resorption ( 84 ).…”
Section: Hard Keratoprosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advances in imaging have resulted in earlier detection of laminar resorption. Avadhanam et al ( 84 ) found that 40% of all cases of laminar resorption were detected in the first year of follow-up and 66% of cases were found within 3 years of OOKP surgery. They also discovered that laminar thickness did not affect the onset or progression of resorption ( 84 ).…”
Section: Hard Keratoprosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avadhanam et al ( 84 ) found that 40% of all cases of laminar resorption were detected in the first year of follow-up and 66% of cases were found within 3 years of OOKP surgery. They also discovered that laminar thickness did not affect the onset or progression of resorption ( 84 ). Multi-detector computerised tomography (MDCT or CT) is widely employed when investigating laminar resorption.…”
Section: Hard Keratoprosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%