2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical study of mode of invasion in tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemotherapy, as one of the important methods for treating tongue cancer, is crucial for the treatment of advanced cases, auxiliary before and after surgery and some patients with distant metastasis, and can effectively improve the prognosis of patients. However, conventional chemotherapy drugs at present are easy to cause a series of side effects [5][6][7][8][9] such as loss of appetite, alopecia, vomiting, nausea, body immunity decline, bone marrow suppression, etc. At present, scholars at home and abroad believe that the combination of drugs can effectively improve the curative effect of tumor and survival rate of patients, but these treatments often increase drug toxicity and cause the risk of cross drug resistance [10][11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy, as one of the important methods for treating tongue cancer, is crucial for the treatment of advanced cases, auxiliary before and after surgery and some patients with distant metastasis, and can effectively improve the prognosis of patients. However, conventional chemotherapy drugs at present are easy to cause a series of side effects [5][6][7][8][9] such as loss of appetite, alopecia, vomiting, nausea, body immunity decline, bone marrow suppression, etc. At present, scholars at home and abroad believe that the combination of drugs can effectively improve the curative effect of tumor and survival rate of patients, but these treatments often increase drug toxicity and cause the risk of cross drug resistance [10][11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%