Clinical study on the effect of intramedullary fixation and extramedullary fixation on unstable intertrochanteric fractures

Abstract

Background: Intertrochanteric fracture of femur is a common fracture in the elderly, and the number of intramedullary nails used to manage intertrochanteric fractures has steadily increased, but the evidence for the clinical efficacy of this practice is lacking. The present study retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes and imaging features of patients with unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with traditional extramedullary hip screws (AO/OTA 31-A2) and patients with the same injury treated with newer intramedullary screws.Methods: Lower limb measurement (LLM) for the main results of the hip-specific tools, functional independence measure (FIM), and "timed up and go" (TUG) to test the scale and timing of the 2-minute walk test were used as secondary tools for clinical outcomes. Other detailed radiological parameters to evaluate the fracture movement, such as heterotopic ossification, and implant failure, were also recorded.Results: There were no significant differences between the intramedullary and extramedullary treatment groups in terms of the measures acquired by the primary or secondary clinical outcome tools (P>0.05), but the radiographic parameters favored the intramedullary treatment group as it showed reduced femoral neck shortening.Conclusions: Although treatment with intramedullary nailing resulted in better radiographic assessment results, this did not translate into better functional recovery outcomes.