1999
DOI: 10.1007/s005950050642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical study on the ratio of glucose/fat in peripheral parenteral nutrition and the usage of a midline catheter

Abstract: Two important unsolved questions related to peripheral parenteral nutrition are the ratio of components in the intravenous (IV) solution and catheter-related complications. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the nutritional profiles of three kinds of IV solutions with different ratios of components, while maintaining the total energy at about 1 200 kcal/day and the amino acid level at 60 g. The IV solution formulas used were as follows : glucose/fat = 2:1, osmolarity ratio = 3.3 for group A, glucose/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines suggest that midlines should be used sparing to administer parenteral nutrition, osmolarity should be less than 850mOsm/L and vigilant monitoring is essential (Pittiruti, Hamilton, Biffi, MacFie & Pertkiewicz, 2009). Matsumoto, Shirotani and Kameoka (1999) agree that midline catheters are safe for the administration of parenteral nutrition, optimally with an osmolarity ratio of 3.1 or less and glucose/fat ratio 1:2.…”
Section: Recommendations For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines suggest that midlines should be used sparing to administer parenteral nutrition, osmolarity should be less than 850mOsm/L and vigilant monitoring is essential (Pittiruti, Hamilton, Biffi, MacFie & Pertkiewicz, 2009). Matsumoto, Shirotani and Kameoka (1999) agree that midline catheters are safe for the administration of parenteral nutrition, optimally with an osmolarity ratio of 3.1 or less and glucose/fat ratio 1:2.…”
Section: Recommendations For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%