2006
DOI: 10.1080/10503300500268524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
237
1
21

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
237
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants perceived that formal supervision had facilitated practice competency in the new assistant roles and the supervisory relationship was considered to be an important component in this process. These studies and others (e.g., Bambling, 2003;Ellis, 2010) provide support for the link between the quality of the supervision relationship and supervision effectiveness. Qualities that contribute to an effective supervisory relationship include the supervisor showing respect, empathy and interest in the supervisee , facilitating a safe and trusting supervisory environment (Bogo et al, 2011;Livni et al, 2012), affording validation and empowerment to the supervisee (Bogo et al, 2011;Umlah, 2006), providing frequent clear non-judgmental feedback (Kilminster & Jolly, 2000), taking account of the supervisee's learning style when presenting information (Rodger, Fitzgerald, Davila, Millar, & Allison, 2011), and ensuring confidentiality and separation from managerial supervision (Cutcliffe & Hyrkas, 2006).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Clinical Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All participants perceived that formal supervision had facilitated practice competency in the new assistant roles and the supervisory relationship was considered to be an important component in this process. These studies and others (e.g., Bambling, 2003;Ellis, 2010) provide support for the link between the quality of the supervision relationship and supervision effectiveness. Qualities that contribute to an effective supervisory relationship include the supervisor showing respect, empathy and interest in the supervisee , facilitating a safe and trusting supervisory environment (Bogo et al, 2011;Livni et al, 2012), affording validation and empowerment to the supervisee (Bogo et al, 2011;Umlah, 2006), providing frequent clear non-judgmental feedback (Kilminster & Jolly, 2000), taking account of the supervisee's learning style when presenting information (Rodger, Fitzgerald, Davila, Millar, & Allison, 2011), and ensuring confidentiality and separation from managerial supervision (Cutcliffe & Hyrkas, 2006).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Clinical Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One variable has been well established as contributing to supervision effectiveness and this is a quality supervisory relationship (Bambling, 2003). For example, researchers exploring allied health practitioner's perceptions of the impact of supervision on their practice in mental health services found that having a positive relationship with the supervisor was significantly associated with perceived impact on practice (Kavanagh et al, 2003).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Clinical Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within such research, results are often mixed. While some studies indicate that supervision can have a positive impact on patient outcomes (Bambling, King, Raue, Schweitzer, & Lambert, 2006;Ost, Karlstedt, & Widen, 2012), other research finds no impact (White & Winstanley, 2010). …”
Section: An Experimental Study Of the Role Of Therapist Gender And Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few, benefits included better outcomes from trained practitioners (Bambling, King, Raue, Schweitzer, & Lambert, 2006); for staff, greater job satisfaction, increased knowledge and confidence, reduced feelings of burnout, improved professional solidarity, and other, more personal, development opportunities (Arvidsson, Löfgren, & Fridlund, 2001;Burnard et al, 2003;Edwards et al, 2006;Rice et al, 2007). It is, however, difficult to comment precisely about what specific benefits resulted from the project, due to the fact that it was not initially set up as a research project, so it was without robust methods through which to evaluate the training and subsequent supervision.…”
Section: Original Article Theoretical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%