2020
DOI: 10.1002/da.23122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical traits of patients with major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder based on propensity score matching

Abstract: Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) with comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) makes the clinical symptoms of patients more complex and more difficult to treat, so more attention should be paid to the recognition of their clinical features. This study investigated the differences between patients with MDD with and without BPD in clinical traits. Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze the retrospective patients' data from August 2012 to September 2019. Altogether, 1381 patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) (Williams, 1988) and the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) (Thompson, 2015) to assess the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. Notably, we used the Chinese versions of the HAMD and HAMA, which have been documented to show great reliability and validity (Zheng et al, 1988) and have been widely applied in the Chinese population (Guo et al, 2015; Lai et al, 2021; Shen et al, 2020; Tong et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) (Williams, 1988) and the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) (Thompson, 2015) to assess the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. Notably, we used the Chinese versions of the HAMD and HAMA, which have been documented to show great reliability and validity (Zheng et al, 1988) and have been widely applied in the Chinese population (Guo et al, 2015; Lai et al, 2021; Shen et al, 2020; Tong et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%