1997
DOI: 10.1002/ana.410410615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical trial of plasma exchange and high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis

Abstract: We have conducted a trial to randomly assess the efficacy and tolerance of intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) or plasma exchange (PE) in myasthenia gravis (MG) exacerbation and to compare two doses of i.v.Ig. Eighty-seven patients with MG exacerbation were randomized to receive either three PE (n = 41), or i.v.Ig (n = 46) 0.4 gm/kg daily further allocated to 3 (n = 23) or 5 days (n = 23). The main end point was the variation of a myasthenic muscular score (MSS) between randomization and day 15. The MSS variat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
318
0
24

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
318
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, although polyvalent antibodies were applied, radical improvement was observed after two plasma exchange procedures. The complications that could be attributed to plasmapheresis were slight, and discontinuation of the procedures was not necessary, as in the cases described in the literature [3,6]. Moreover, the amount of plasma exchanged at any one time was higher in our patient (3254, 2662 mL) compared to the case reported in literature, which also affected the efficacy of plasmapheresis [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our case, although polyvalent antibodies were applied, radical improvement was observed after two plasma exchange procedures. The complications that could be attributed to plasmapheresis were slight, and discontinuation of the procedures was not necessary, as in the cases described in the literature [3,6]. Moreover, the amount of plasma exchanged at any one time was higher in our patient (3254, 2662 mL) compared to the case reported in literature, which also affected the efficacy of plasmapheresis [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…One of the few prospective, randomised studies (which was carried out on a group of 87 patients) did not indicate a significant difference in the clinical improvement between patients treated with high doses of immunoglobulins and those administered plasmapheresis. According to advocates of immunotherapy, high doses of immunoglobulins (0.4 g kg -1 day -1 for 5 days) are equally effective and carry a lower risk of complications [6]. In our case, although polyvalent antibodies were applied, radical improvement was observed after two plasma exchange procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It took more than a decade until the first controlled trial was published, comparing IVIg and PE in patients with myasthenic crisis [Gajdos et al 1997]. The effectiveness has been confirmed by another controlled trial comparing IVIg with placebo in patients with worsening weakness due to myasthenia gravis [Zinman et al 2007].…”
Section: Myasthenia Gravismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Osserman and MGFA classification system are based on the general impression of physicians on involvement and severity. Hence, using them as the hallmark of severity is a vicious circle; (II) composite ordinal scales such as Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMGs) (36), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (37), Myasthenic Muscle Scale (MMS) (38), which are commonly used in Western countries, and the Absolute and Relative Score of MG (ARS-MG) (39), a commonly used scale in China. In 60 representative MG patients, all four scales were found to have good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, interobserver reliability, and construct validity.…”
Section: Relative Precision In the Main Domains Of Myasthenia Gravis mentioning
confidence: 99%