2023
DOI: 10.1515/almed-2023-0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical use of bone markers: a challenge to variability

Xavier Filella,
Núria Guañabens

Abstract: Bone markers are a group of substances released into circulation during bone formation and/or resorption. These substances can be measured in blood and urine to obtain information about metabolic bone disorders. This review provides an insight into factors influencing bone marker variability and describes different approaches to minimize variability and interpret results appropriately. Variability in bone marker concentrations results from biological and analytical variability across assays. Other influencing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although serum bone markers are repeatedly proposed for assessing the osteoporosis risk, we observed random expressions of these markers with relatively large variations and no tracible reproducibility in both BMD and age wise categorizations. This is in line with already reported confounding effects from intra-subject variations (15,16) that hamper optimal bone marker selection in routine practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although serum bone markers are repeatedly proposed for assessing the osteoporosis risk, we observed random expressions of these markers with relatively large variations and no tracible reproducibility in both BMD and age wise categorizations. This is in line with already reported confounding effects from intra-subject variations (15,16) that hamper optimal bone marker selection in routine practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…are based on invasive blood sampling. Beyond this, there is no clear consensus on the selection of optimal markers and the interpretation of results are frequently confounded by intra-subject and/or intra-and inter-assay variations (15,16). Though hand grip strength measurement is considered for musculoskeletal integrity assessment in osteoporosis (17), various confounding physio-metabolic effects from subject's overall biological aging dilute a clear clinical relationship only to bone health (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%