2022
DOI: 10.23736/s0031-0808.21.04437-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical use of cangrelor: a real-world multicenter experience from South Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data confirmed that Cangrelor is more often used in clinically unstable patients such as those with CS and/or treated with inotropic drugs and/or with CCA at presentation and/or intubated and, concordantly, in those with a severely reduced LVEF. This is in line with previous evidence 23 , 24 and can be partly explained by the impracticability of the oral route or the uncertainty of intestinal absorption in patients with high-risk clinical presentation, both limitations easily overcome by the intravenous administration of Cangrelor. Moreover, our analysis suggests the possible preference towards Cangrelor in patients with higher risk of bleeding as indicated by the higher rate of patients with history of previous bleeding and the higher (despite at the limit for significance) PRECISE DAPT score in the Cangrelor group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our data confirmed that Cangrelor is more often used in clinically unstable patients such as those with CS and/or treated with inotropic drugs and/or with CCA at presentation and/or intubated and, concordantly, in those with a severely reduced LVEF. This is in line with previous evidence 23 , 24 and can be partly explained by the impracticability of the oral route or the uncertainty of intestinal absorption in patients with high-risk clinical presentation, both limitations easily overcome by the intravenous administration of Cangrelor. Moreover, our analysis suggests the possible preference towards Cangrelor in patients with higher risk of bleeding as indicated by the higher rate of patients with history of previous bleeding and the higher (despite at the limit for significance) PRECISE DAPT score in the Cangrelor group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our data con rmed that Cangrelor is more often used in clinically unstable patients such as those with CS and/or treated with inotropic drugs and/or with CCA at presentation and/or intubated and, concordantly, in those with a severely reduced LVEF. This is in line with previous evidence 23,24 and can be partly explained by the impracticability of the oral route or the uncertainty of intestinal absorption in patients with high-risk clinical presentation, both limitations easily overcome by the intravenous administration of Cangrelor. Moreover, our analysis suggests the possible preference towards Cangrelor in patients with higher risk of bleeding as indicated by the higher rate of patients with history of previous bleeding and the higher (despite at the limit for signi cance) PRECISE DAPT score in the Cangrelor group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Notwithstanding the randomized nature, the CHAMPION studies present some limitations which have been widely recognized over time. Firstly the CHAMPION population was at relatively low ischemic risk since more than 30% of patients were addressed to PCI because ofCCS 25 , which does not re ect the prevalent clinical setting in which the drug has been used, so far, in the real-world as suggested by several recent registries 23,24,26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials that led to the cangrelor approval were mainly performed on patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA), 19–21 but cangrelor has increasingly been used in STEMI in real‐life practice 22–25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Trials that led to the cangrelor approval were mainly performed on patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA), [19][20][21] but cangrelor has increasingly been used in STEMI in real-life practice. [22][23][24][25] European Medicines Agency (EMA) suggested to the marketing authorization holder of cangrelor (Chiesi) to perform a postauthorization nonimposed safety study (Category 3) 26 focused on ACS,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%