2010
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Use of Intravenous Iron: Administration, Efficacy, and Safety

Abstract: This section reviews the history, pharmacology, administration, efficacy, and toxicity of intravenous iron. Intravenous iron offers advantages over oral iron for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia across a wide range of disease states associated with absolute and functional iron deficiency. However, there remain concerns about the acute safety profiles of the available preparations and the potential for long-term toxicity with their repeated administration. Seven intravenous iron formulations are availabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
217
0
15

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
217
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of SAEs from prospective studies is extremely low but current reporting mechanisms tell us little about the relative frequency among products. Based on the preponderance of published evidence, IV iron is safe and probably much safer than most physicians realize, supporting a larger and earlier role for IV iron and raising the question of whether parenteral iron should be frontline therapy in conditions where oral iron will predictably be suboptimal [39].…”
Section: Safety Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency of SAEs from prospective studies is extremely low but current reporting mechanisms tell us little about the relative frequency among products. Based on the preponderance of published evidence, IV iron is safe and probably much safer than most physicians realize, supporting a larger and earlier role for IV iron and raising the question of whether parenteral iron should be frontline therapy in conditions where oral iron will predictably be suboptimal [39].…”
Section: Safety Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the available products are shown in Table III. While there is currently no FDA approval for these doses, LMW iron dextran, ferumoxytol, FCM, and iron isomaltoside can be given as a large replacement dose (up to 1,000 mg or more) in a single visit, while FG and IS must be given in lower doses due to infusion reactions above 250 mg and 300 mg, respectively [38,39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only formulation currently utilized in the US with which a full treatment course may be administered at a single sitting, total dose infusion (TDI), is low molecular weight (LMW) iron dextran [6]. The package insert recommends single bolus injections of 100 mg, however published reports suggest that 1,000 mg of iron dextran can be safely administered over 1-4 hr [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 While intravenous (IV) iron by passes these problems, fear remains about its harmful effects and the potential for long-term hazards from multiple doses of iron administration. 17,18 Parenteral iron preparations which were available in the olden days were associated with dangerous complications like anaphylactic reactions and death, due to which they have gone in disrepute. 19 The high-molecular-weight iron dextran formulation most frequently were responsible for these side effects seen in 2.3% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%