1986
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.17.2.328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical use of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in stroke.

Abstract: SUMMARY There are many positive aspects to the use of MRI in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. First, the MR imaging technique appears to be essentially without hazard. 26 It does not rely on ionizing radiation, and no intravenous injections of contrast agent are necessary. MRI exploits the tissue's inherent biophysical characteristics to provide superior contrast. Infarctions are well delineated by MRI, often better and earlier than CT.13 ' 15> M Because of the lack of MRI signal from bone and thus t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
4

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A significantly (p < 0.001) greater num ber of silent infarcts (asymptomatics or unreported strokes, mainly old LIs) was detected by MR (42%) than by CT scan (18.5 %) in our series. This result is consistent with the observations of other authors [1,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A significantly (p < 0.001) greater num ber of silent infarcts (asymptomatics or unreported strokes, mainly old LIs) was detected by MR (42%) than by CT scan (18.5 %) in our series. This result is consistent with the observations of other authors [1,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…On these occasions, a greater number of associated cerebrovascular lesions and a superior def inition of the lesion, in comparison with the brain CT scan, has been observed [1,15,16]. The only series pub lished to date in which MR was used to diagnose an LI is that of Rothrock et al [ 17], who studied 31 patients and obtained positive results in 74%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Publications including the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the diagnosis of lacunes are scanty. 20 - 28 We describe our experience with lacunes through the clinical analysis of 227 patients, 45 of whom were studied using both CT and MRI. The aims of our study were to conduct a statistical analysis of a prospective clinical series and to compare, in approximately one fifth of these patients, the diagnostic usefulness of MRI and CT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the beginning of 1990s, MRI was reserved mainly for the subacute phase of ischemic stroke, because the most widely available conventional sequence -T2-weighted imaging -shows infarct lesions only after 6-8 hours as a hyperintense zone 9, 10 and a T1-weighted sequence even later and as a hypointense lesion 11 . Conventional MRI offered mainly higher resolution capability for detection of relatively smaller infarcts, especially in the brain stem and cerebellum compared to CT 12,13 . The use of urgent MRI in acute stroke was also limited for generally prevailing pessimism for low sensitivity in the detection of acute ICH or SAH compared to CT. Fortunately, this pessimism disappeared completely when more accurate MRI machines and new echoplanar sequences (T2*) capable of safely detecting brain hemorrhage became established in clinical practice [14][15][16][17] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%