Abstract:Preoperative and postoperative serum levels of carbohydrate antigen‐(CA)19‐9 in 148 patients with carcinoma of the pancreas were studied. All 18 patients with carcinoma of the pancreas of Stage I, II, and III were resectable, and their pre‐operative serum levels of CA‐19‐9 were under 1,344 U/ml. Pre‐operative serum levels of CA‐19‐9 in patients with Stage IV ranged widely between 5 and 32,240 U/ml. The postoperative survival rate was significantly superior in patients (n = 15) whose CA‐19‐9 pre‐operative serum… Show more
“…22 Our study confirmed that elevated serum CA 19-9 level correlates with a poor survival as corroborated by several studies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]23 Our study also found that patients with VHL (over 800 IU/ml) had equivalent survival as patients with HL. Thus, although a serum CA 19-9 level of 150 or 300 IU/ml preoperatively may discriminate between patients with good and poor outcome, 5, 12-14, 16 levels over 400 IU/ml, however high, have no additional effect on survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…12 Moreover, some investigators have found that elevated preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels are significantly associated with tumor unresectability, although the cut-off levels reported range from 100 to 350 IU/ml. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Based on these data, some speculate that preoperative staging of a potentially resectable PA should routinely include serum CA 19-9 levels after biliary decompression. In the case where careful preoperative staging indicates a radiographically resectable PA without evidence of distant metastasis but the serum CA 19-9 levels are highly elevated, the staging might be better clarified by the use of laparoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the cut-off in this study was 180 IU/ml and very few patients with high serum CA 19-9 levels (>400 IU/ml) were enrolled. Nakao et al 17 published over 10 years ago a report of 15 resected patients with serum CA 19-9 levels >2,000 IU/ml. These patients had a median survival of 6 months and were all dead after 19 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Several reports have shown that a serum CA19-9 level above 200 or 300 IU/ml correlates with poor outcome and conclude that such patients will likely not benefit from surgery. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] A minority of patients with resectable PA have high levels (>400 IU/ml) of serum CA19-9. Even when patients with high serum CA 19-9 are determined to be radiographically resectable, they will often have metastasis discovered at the time of laparoscopy or laparotomy.…”
Patients who normalized their CA19-9 levels postoperatively had equivalent survival to patients with normal preoperative CA 19-9 levels. Preoperative serum CA 19-9 level by itself should not preclude surgery in patients who have undergone careful preoperative staging.
“…22 Our study confirmed that elevated serum CA 19-9 level correlates with a poor survival as corroborated by several studies. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]23 Our study also found that patients with VHL (over 800 IU/ml) had equivalent survival as patients with HL. Thus, although a serum CA 19-9 level of 150 or 300 IU/ml preoperatively may discriminate between patients with good and poor outcome, 5, 12-14, 16 levels over 400 IU/ml, however high, have no additional effect on survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…12 Moreover, some investigators have found that elevated preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels are significantly associated with tumor unresectability, although the cut-off levels reported range from 100 to 350 IU/ml. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Based on these data, some speculate that preoperative staging of a potentially resectable PA should routinely include serum CA 19-9 levels after biliary decompression. In the case where careful preoperative staging indicates a radiographically resectable PA without evidence of distant metastasis but the serum CA 19-9 levels are highly elevated, the staging might be better clarified by the use of laparoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the cut-off in this study was 180 IU/ml and very few patients with high serum CA 19-9 levels (>400 IU/ml) were enrolled. Nakao et al 17 published over 10 years ago a report of 15 resected patients with serum CA 19-9 levels >2,000 IU/ml. These patients had a median survival of 6 months and were all dead after 19 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Several reports have shown that a serum CA19-9 level above 200 or 300 IU/ml correlates with poor outcome and conclude that such patients will likely not benefit from surgery. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] A minority of patients with resectable PA have high levels (>400 IU/ml) of serum CA19-9. Even when patients with high serum CA 19-9 are determined to be radiographically resectable, they will often have metastasis discovered at the time of laparoscopy or laparotomy.…”
Patients who normalized their CA19-9 levels postoperatively had equivalent survival to patients with normal preoperative CA 19-9 levels. Preoperative serum CA 19-9 level by itself should not preclude surgery in patients who have undergone careful preoperative staging.
“…2,3 The relationship between increases in CA 19-9 and poor survival is well documented. [4][5][6][7] Numerous studies have shown that CA 19-9 is associated not only with resectability but also with tumor stage in pancreatic cancer. [8][9][10] In fact, Schlieman et al 8 suggested that an increased CA 19-9 level is predictive of unresectability at the time of exploration even when there is no evidence of unresectability on preoperative imaging studies.…”
Our findings do not support a cutoff value for CA 19-9 that is associated with margin or lymph node involvement. Preoperative CA 19-9 < or = 120 U/ml is, however, associated with increased overall and recurrence-free survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.