1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01281.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Utility of Assays of Glycosylated Haemoglobin and Serum Fructosamine Compared: Use of Data on Biological Variation

Abstract: Assessment of the relative clinical usefulness of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) and serum fructosamine is complicated by their markedly different half-lives. They have therefore been compared using a number of indices derived from data on biological variation, as applied in a study of blood glucose control in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. The within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) variation of fructosamine and HbA1 were assessed in 8 stable diabetic patients. A slightly smaller relative change, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians see the effects of total variation when treating patients, so the pathological variation must be included in the calculation of the quality requirement. This is in keeping with Fraser as 'there are some data derived from groups with specific disease in the literature' 19 , including diabetes [20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Total Imprecisionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinicians see the effects of total variation when treating patients, so the pathological variation must be included in the calculation of the quality requirement. This is in keeping with Fraser as 'there are some data derived from groups with specific disease in the literature' 19 , including diabetes [20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Total Imprecisionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Combining a manufacturer's CV A of 2.14% 28 and CV I of 5.1%, results in a CV T of 5.5%. This is likely to be an underestimate as the listed CV A is often less than that found in routine practice 12 and higher CV I s have been reported [20][21][22]24 . Using the total error concept, this implies: TE < Bias + (1.65 × Total variation) (CV at any set point) 1% < Bias + (1.65 × 0.055 × 7.0)% (when using the general ADA A1C target of 7.0% Bias < 1 -0.64%, i.e.…”
Section: Effects Of Bias and Total Variation In Practicementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Her2 expression in breast cancer 43 Human chorionic gonadotropin protein and pregnancy 44 Triple Test/Quad Test in Down's syndrome 45 Estriol, b-HCG, alfa-fetoprotein Estriol, b-HCG, alfa-fetoprotein, inhibin Health OncoDx test for breast cancer 46 21 genes for prediction of best treatment Glycosylated haemoglobin and serum fructosamine in type II diabetes 47 One problem that we have faced in the development of this test relates to the fact that the targeted patient populations were selected and classified on the basis of DSM-IV criteria which is sometimes questionable, as discussed above. Therefore, our initial studies involved systematic selection of patients with regards to psychopathology and disease stage with a focus on paranoid schizophrenia patients who were mostly in the first episode of illness and drug naive.…”
Section: Table 2 Biomarker Tests Used In Other Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the improvement or deteriation of blood glucose level in short period are not reflected exactly with HbA1C. However, fructosamine levels indicate all glycated proteins including albumin, lipoprotein and globulin and has been reported to show larger intra-individual variability compared with HbA1C [27]. Serum protein concentrations and dilutional anemia which may develop during pregnancy can affect fructosamine levels [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%