ABSTRACTappropriate WHO morphological subtype (the number of blast cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow, percentage of ring sideroblasts in bone marrow and myelodysplastic features) was evaluated.
Design and Methods
Patients and samplesSamples of bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood from 50 patients with a clearly established diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2008 criteria and diagnosed at two of the participating centers (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona and Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia) were included in this retrospective analysis. In all instances the analyzed samples had been obtained at initial evaluation. The number of cases of the different WHO 2008 morphological subtypes selected for review was prefixed according to their expected incidence in previous studies. 4 Preference for inclusion in the study was given to cases diagnosed in more recent years and with good quality samples available. Table 2 summarizes the main characteristics of the patients.
Morphological studiesFour smears from each patient included in the study were available for blind and independent microscopical review by four experienced cytologists from three centers. Two bone marrow and one peripheral blood May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained smears were used for assessing percentages of blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow and percentages of dysplastic cells of the three myeloid cell lines. An additional Prussian blue-stained bone marrow smear was used for assessing the percentage of ring sideroblasts. The cytologists had a meeting to discuss the evaluation of dysplasia and diagnosis using training slides. Blasts and ring sideroblasts were defined according to the recent consensus proposals of the International Working Group on Morphology of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (IWGM-MDS). 15 The WHO 2008 recommendations for evaluating the morphological diagnosis of MDS were followed strictly. Thus, bone marrow blast counts were calculated as percentages of all bone marrow nucleated cells. Peripheral blood and bone marrow differential counts were performed on at least 200 and 500 cells, respectively. The evaluation of dysplasia was based on morphological criteria described in the 2008 WHO publication. 4 Briefly, the following morphological features of dysplasia were evaluated: (i) dyserythropoiesis: nuclear budding, internuclear bridging, karyorrhexis, multinuclearity, nuclear hyperlobation, megaloblastic changes, basophil stippling, ring sideroblasts and vacuolization; (ii) dysgranulopoiesis: nuclear hypolobation (pseudo Pelger-Huët), irregular hypersegmentation, agranularity, pseudo Chediak-Higashi granules, Auer rods and Döhle bodies; and (iii) dysmegakaryocytopoiesis: micromegakaryocytes, nuclear hypolobation, and multinucleation. As defined in the WHO 2008 classification, the threshold used for considering a myeloid cell line as dysplastic was the presence of ≥10% abnormal cells in the corresponding myeloid lineage. To assess dysplasia at least 200 neutrophils, 200 erythroid precursors and 30 megakaryocytes were eval...