Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Imaging with the Optos Optomap Compared with Indirect Ophthalmoscopy in the Setting of Non-Traumatic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Kornberg, Daniel L; Klufas, Michael A.; Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.; Orlin, Anton; D’Amico, Donald J.; Kiss, Szilárd

doi:10.3109/08820538.2014.981551

Cited by 28 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in non-KPro eyes, the authors have previously found that the Optos Optomap provides good detection and documentation of retinal detachments but is suboptimal for detecting retinal holes, tears, and other more subtle pathology, especially in the superior and inferior periphery. 30 In addition, UWF images were not directly compared with B-scan ultrasonography in this study. Although UWF images were able to sufficiently characterize vitreoretinal pathology in all but 1 case in this study, future directions would include a prospective trial directly comparing the ability of UWF imaging and B-scan ultrasonography to detect pathology and complement the clinical examination.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Posterior Segment Pathology in the Setting of the Boston Keratoprosthesis

Kornberg

Yannuzzi

Klufas³

et al. 2016

Retina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Posterior Segment Pathology in the Setting of the Boston Keratoprosthesis

Kornberg

Yannuzzi

Klufas³

et al. 2016

Retina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Wide-field imaging may be used to supplement fundus examination for characterizing and documenting retinal detachments [7,43]. Use of wide-field systems in the diagnosis and evaluation of retinal detachments is, however, controversial.…”

Section: Retinal Detachmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wide-Field Retinal Imaging in Adults and Children

Bilgeç¹,

Erol²,

Topbaş³

2019

Novel Diagnostic Methods in Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wide-field retinal imaging has become an important standard of care imaging modality in many retinal disorders both in adults and children. The recently developed wide-field retinal imaging systems enable approximately 200° imaging of retina. In this chapter, we would like to review the use of wide-field retinal imaging in disorders such as retinal vascular diseases, uveal and retinal inflammatory diseases, intraocular tumors, peripheral retinal pathologies, and retinal disorders in children such as retinopathy of prematurity, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, and Coats' disease. Also, we would like to address the rapidly expanding role of peripheral retinal imaging in treating systemic diseases. The use of wide-field imaging technologies in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and documentation of retinal pathologies and the new information provided by wide-field angiography for retinal vascular diseases and macular problems will be discussed.

show abstract

“…63 In a retrospective study involving 36 eyes of 34 patients, wide-field more precisely documented the extent of retinal detachments in 13.9 % of cases, but failed to detect retinal holes in the superior and inferior quadrants in 11.1 % and 19.4 % of cases, respectively. 64 Retinopexy was not detected superiorly and inferiorly in 19.4 % of cases. Finally, a third study found moderate sensitivity for lesions posterior to the equator and low sensitivity anterior to the equator.…”

Section: Retinal Detachmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, a third study found moderate sensitivity for lesions posterior to the equator and low sensitivity anterior to the equator. 64 Specifically, for lesions posterior to the equator, sensitivity overall was 74 %, and 76 % for lesions requiring treatment, whereas for lesions anterior to the equator, sensitivity overall was 45 % and 36 % for treatable lesions. Specificity was 85 %.…”

Section: Retinal Detachmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wide-field Imaging of Retinal Diseases

Kim¹,

Moshfeghi²

2015

US Ophthalmic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

125Retinal imaging serves as a critical adjunct to the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of numerous ocular diseases. Since the invention of the direct ophthalmoscope by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1851, techniques to visualize the fundus have grown exponentially both in number and sophistication. Notably, wide-field retinal imaging has taken center stage over the past 2 decades. Given its increasing popularity in research and clinical use, it is important to be aware of the different types of wide-field imaging currently available, as well as the clinical applications for, advantages, and limitations of widefield retinal imaging. This review article aims to highlight our current understanding of wide-field retinal imaging and provide an outlook for its future implications. Historical PerspectiveThe first fundus camera was developed by Frederick Dimmer at the turn of the 20th century. Dimmer was the first to incorporate fundus photography into an ophthalmic textbook, and he published the first photographic atlas in black-and-white. AbstractRetinal imaging serves as a critical adjunct to the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of numerous ocular diseases. In particular, wide-field retinal imaging is quickly moving to the forefront in imaging the posterior segment. While conventional fundus imaging captures 30 to 50° field of view in a single capture, significant advances have been made in the past 2 decades to increase the viewing angle, speed, and accuracy of fundus photography, such that a single-field capture is now up to 200°. Moreover, multiple imaging modalities, including color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and autofluorescence, are now available a single wide-field imaging platform. This breadth of functionality makes wide-field imaging especially useful in peripheral retinal vascular diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, posterior uveitis, and retinopathy of prematurity. This review aims to provide a historical perspective on wide-field retinal imaging, highlight the imaging platforms currently available, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of wide-field versus conventional fundus imaging, summarize the current clinical applications of wide-field retinal imaging, and provide an outlook for its future implications. KeywordsWide-field imaging, ultra-wide-field imaging, retinal imaging, Optos, Heidelberg, fluorescein angiography, autofluorescence, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, retinopathy of prematurity Disclosure: Esther Kim, MD, has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Andrew A Moshfeghi, MD, MBA, has been a consultant

show abstract

Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Imaging with the Optos Optomap Compared with Indirect Ophthalmoscopy in the Setting of Non-Traumatic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Abstract: Ultra-widefield imaging is a useful adjunct for documentation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and their postoperative repair. However, detection of retinal holes, tears, and postoperative scarring is poor, especially in the inferior and superior periphery.

Cited by 28 publications

References 19 publications

Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Posterior Segment Pathology in the Setting of the Boston Keratoprosthesis

Ultra-Widefield Imaging of Posterior Segment Pathology in the Setting of the Boston Keratoprosthesis

Wide-Field Retinal Imaging in Adults and Children

Wide-field Imaging of Retinal Diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About