cases of this strategy being adopted to overcome contingent issues. 18,19 In addition, the long-term benefits that may be derived from BITA use are still unproven. 15 Therefore, we reviewed pooled results from 3 large series of patients who underwent BITA grafting concomitant with other cardiac operations at 3 European centers with extensive experience in BITA use. The aims of this retrospective study were to describe the immediate and long-term outcomes of these patients, and to identify independent T he use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in addition to other cardiac operations (combined CABG) is mostly regarded as a risky strategy. The increased length of surgery, as well as the increased risk of bleeding and sternal complications from BITA harvest 1-15 could outweigh the potential benefits of reduced manipulation of the ascending aorta, either natural or prosthetic. 6,7,10,16,17 Consequently, there are no large studies exploring the outcomes of surgery that combines use of BITA with procedures on cardiac valves, the left ventricle, and/or thoracic aorta. The only available evidence stems from anecdotal Editorial p 2416