2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07690-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically relevant prognostic and predictive markers for immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract: Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have expanded our choice of agents for the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, not all patients will experience favorable response to treatment with ICI and may even suffer from severe side effects. Therefore, prognostic and predictive markers, beyond programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, are of utmost importance for decision making in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(213 reference statements)
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a positive KRAS status was significantly associated with worse median PFS in 2nd-line D+R and was also an independent predictor of worse PFS in multivariate Cox regression analysis. To date, there is little evidence on the role of KRAS status in D+R therapy (30). Although KRAS mutations might increase the expression of VEGF, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 in various tumors including NSCLC, the underlying mechanisms is still unclear (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a positive KRAS status was significantly associated with worse median PFS in 2nd-line D+R and was also an independent predictor of worse PFS in multivariate Cox regression analysis. To date, there is little evidence on the role of KRAS status in D+R therapy (30). Although KRAS mutations might increase the expression of VEGF, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 in various tumors including NSCLC, the underlying mechanisms is still unclear (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in first-line and second-line settings, ICI monotherapy and dual therapy or a therapeutic approach in combination with chemotherapy has displayed an overall survival benefit compared to standard platinum-based regimens [23,[27][28][29]. However, not all patients experience favorable response to treatment with ICI due to severe side effects and underlying clinical condition [30]. Although the development of targeted therapy has improved the clinical outcome in a subgroup of lung cancer patients, the five-year survival rate is still less than 20% [2,9,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender is a reportedly relevant element that modulates the expression of the PD-1 pathway ( 147 ). In addition, male patients demonstrate a better efficacy of single agent ICIs treatment than their female counterparts ( 147 , 148 ). No studies have illustrated the difference in ICI-related irAEs between men and women ( 146 , 149 ).…”
Section: Contributory Factors Of Ocular Iraes In Lung Cancer Secondary To Icismentioning
confidence: 99%