2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically Responsive Genomic Analysis Pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Original WES studies were performed at the Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics (KCCG) and the NSW Health Pathology Randwick Genomics Laboratory (RGL), with one family sequenced at Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen (RUMC). 41% of the original KCCG and RGL WES cohort had diagnostic findings [ 12 , 13 ]. Following completion of WES analysis, individuals who remained undiagnosed were recruited for WGS, resulting in 38 families with 59 affected individuals and 41 unaffected first-degree relatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Original WES studies were performed at the Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics (KCCG) and the NSW Health Pathology Randwick Genomics Laboratory (RGL), with one family sequenced at Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen (RUMC). 41% of the original KCCG and RGL WES cohort had diagnostic findings [ 12 , 13 ]. Following completion of WES analysis, individuals who remained undiagnosed were recruited for WGS, resulting in 38 families with 59 affected individuals and 41 unaffected first-degree relatives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family 12 had WES at RUMC on the SOLiD platform as described previously [ 14 ]. Accredited WES bioinformatics pipelines were utilised including GAIA at RGL [ 13 ], in-house methods at the RUMC, and Seave at KCCG [ 12 ]. CNV analysis was performed using Conifer [ 15 ] or XHMM [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Library preparation was performed using an Agilent SureSelect XT Low Input Clinical Research Exome x 2 (Agilent CRE v2) kit, with libraries analyzed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument. A NATA-approved in-house pipeline (GAIA) was used to annotate, filter and prioritize high-quality variants that differed from the reference sequence [11]. The following parameters where then analyzed in identified candidate variant: mutational class, zygosity/ inheritance patterns, population frequency, allele case frequency data (from disease-specific publications and ClinVar), conservation data, protein/domain structure databases, phenotype databases, pathogenicity predictions, functional/animal model studies, and mutation spectrum of the disease.…”
Section: Methods Massively Parallel Sequencing (Mps) Sanger Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sundercombe et al, 2021), especially given ethnic differences, which we have shown examples of in our dataset of Emirati variants. As we have outlined, CTGA contains variant data along with phenotypic data, a feature many other genomic databases lack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The clinical significance (CS) of a gene variant is one of the main components of the diagnostic pipeline for genetic disorders (Sundercombe et al, 2021). On CTGA, we report CS according to Clinvar, where available, as well as CTGA CS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%