1992
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.60.3.402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited.

Abstract: The relationship between statistically and clinically significant change has been enigmatic. Jacobson and Truax (1991) have proposed an important step toward rapprochement. However, their suggested index of clinically significant change neglects possible confounding of improvement rate estimates by regression to the mean. An alternative method is described that incorporates an adjustment that minimizes this confounding when statistical regression has been shown to be present. If regression is not present, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
200
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
200
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the longitudinal analyses, all models were adjusted for baseline physical performance. Decline in physical performance during 3 years of follow-up was assessed using the Edwards-Nunnally index to determine clinically significant change (Speer, 1992). The index is adjusted for regression to the mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longitudinal analyses, all models were adjusted for baseline physical performance. Decline in physical performance during 3 years of follow-up was assessed using the Edwards-Nunnally index to determine clinically significant change (Speer, 1992). The index is adjusted for regression to the mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine if a change in an individual's score was statistically reliable, the Reliable Change Index (RCI) was calculated according to the Edwards-Nunnally method [23]. This method minimizes the influence of regression to the mean in the calculation of improvement rates.…”
Section: ■ Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The change scores were dichotomized into "decline" and "no decline," with PϽ0.10 as statistical cutoff score. The analyses were performed with multiple logistic regression models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%