2013
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e31827943c6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically Significant Weight Gain 1 Year After Occupational Back Injury

Abstract: Objective To examine the incidence of clinically significant weight gain one year after occupational back injury, and risk factors for that gain. Methods A cohort of Washington State workers with wage-replacement benefits for back injuries completed baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone interviews. We obtained additional measures from claims and medical records. Results Among 1,263 workers, 174 (13.8%) reported clinically significant weight gain (≥7%) 1 year after occupational back injury. Women and work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including subjects followed for a longer time would allow more time for behavioral and health changes that may take place after the injury to affect the incidence of common chronic diseases, in particular. As mentioned earlier, previous prospective studies in occupational and nonoccupational populations have found that injuries may reduce physical activity and be associated with subsequent weight gain . We did still observe modest increases in HRs for chronic diseases, and the increase in mortality for circulatory disease among men was statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Including subjects followed for a longer time would allow more time for behavioral and health changes that may take place after the injury to affect the incidence of common chronic diseases, in particular. As mentioned earlier, previous prospective studies in occupational and nonoccupational populations have found that injuries may reduce physical activity and be associated with subsequent weight gain . We did still observe modest increases in HRs for chronic diseases, and the increase in mortality for circulatory disease among men was statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Prospective studies have documented that work‐related injuries may affect long‐term physical and mental health and well‐being, including factors associated with mortality. For instance, injuries may lead to decreased physical activity and increased weight gain . In addition, workers who suffered injuries may also have enduring disabilities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important finding because obese workers who are injured may experience long-term adverse mental and physical outcomes (Keeney et al, 2013; Schulz & Sherwood, 2008). To reduce obesity-related workplace injury, employers could implement work risk assessments such as evaluating physical demands and sequence of tasks, identifying occupational stressors (excessive workload, overtime, workplace conflict) and organizational stressors (difficult relationships with coworkers, lack of support, lack of motivation) in the workplace, and appropriate implementation of a job rotation program (if the job is required for 24 h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a systematic review study, it was reported that although the risk of injury among obese persons was slightly increased, many of the estimates were not statistically significant (Pollack & Cheskin, 2007). Another study conducted among workers in Washington State indicated that obese women with occupational back injuries showed significant weight gain after one year of the occurrence (Keeney et al, 2013). The relationship between obesity and injury appears to be bidirectional, with one impacting the risk of the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant weight gain during follow-up was defined by the standard criterion of a > 7% increase relative to baseline (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Study Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%