PsycTESTS Dataset 1996
DOI: 10.1037/t08962-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale For Children and Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
213
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
213
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The family was asked for participation, if a child met the following inclusion criteria: 1) medical in-or outpatient treatment due to an road traffic accident; 2) age between 7 and 16 years; 3) fluency in German; 4) no severe head injury [score above 10 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (Teasdale & Jennett, 1974) (Bryant & Harvey, 2002;Bryant, Salmon, Sinclair, & Davidson, 2007) if criteria for one of the symptom clusters were not fulfilled. Previous studies have confirmed the reliability and validity of these instruments (Nader et al, 2002;Steil & Füchsel, 2005). Symptom severity was assessed by ASD / PTSD total scores (sum of frequency and intensity ratings) which showed excellent internal consistencies ( = .88 to .95 at the different assessments).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The family was asked for participation, if a child met the following inclusion criteria: 1) medical in-or outpatient treatment due to an road traffic accident; 2) age between 7 and 16 years; 3) fluency in German; 4) no severe head injury [score above 10 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (Teasdale & Jennett, 1974) (Bryant & Harvey, 2002;Bryant, Salmon, Sinclair, & Davidson, 2007) if criteria for one of the symptom clusters were not fulfilled. Previous studies have confirmed the reliability and validity of these instruments (Nader et al, 2002;Steil & Füchsel, 2005). Symptom severity was assessed by ASD / PTSD total scores (sum of frequency and intensity ratings) which showed excellent internal consistencies ( = .88 to .95 at the different assessments).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The scores are not used for statistical analysis. The semi-structured interviews used in this study are the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA; Lindauer, 2014; Nader et al, 1996) and the PTSD module of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA). The CAPS-CA is administered to children aged 8–15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En outre, afi n de diminuer les risques de stigmatisation pouvant être vécue après la passation d'un questionnaire, Cashmore (2006) recommande d'implanter une procé-dure formelle de suivi afi n de détecter toute forme d'inconfort et de malaise, voire de détresse, induit par la révélation de situations traumatisantes. (Nader et al, 1996) pour évaluer l'état de stress post-traumatique et l' Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale (Armstrong et al, 1997) pour identifi er les symptômes de dissociation. La première est une entrevue semi-structurée visant les enfants de huit ans et plus qui permet d'établir une impression diagnostique d'état de stress post-traumatique, alors que la seconde est un questionnaire auto-rapporté qui évalue les formes normatives et pathologiques de dissociation.…”
Section: éValuation Des éVénements Traumatiquesunclassified