Clinician and Patient Experience of Internet-Mediated Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Therapy

Abstract

Many eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapists moved their practice online during COVID-19. We conducted surveys and interviews to understand the implementation and acceptability of online EMDR therapy. From 17 June to 2nd August 2021 an online survey was open to EMDR therapists from the EMDR Association UK & Ireland and EMDR International Association email lists, and, through them, their clients. Questions related to determinants of implementation (for therapists) and acceptability (for clients) of online EMDR. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of therapist respondents to provide a deeper understanding of survey responses. Survey responses were received from therapists (n = 562) from five continents, and their clients (n = 148). 88% of clients responded as being extremely or very comfortable receiving EMDR therapy online. At the initial point of ‘social distancing’, 54% of therapists indicated strong or partial reluctance to deliver online EMDR therapy compared to 11% just over one year later. Four fifths of therapists intended to continue offering online therapy after restrictions were lifted. Free-text responses and interview data showed that deprivation and clinical severity could lead to exclusion from online EMDR. Internet connectivity could disrupt sessions, lead to cancellations, or affect the therapy process. Therapists benefited from training in online working. Online EMDR is generally acceptable to therapists and clients, with reservations about digital exclusion, case severity, poor internet connectivity and the need for training. Further research is needed to confirm that online EMDR is clinically non-inferior to in-person working.

Clinicians' experiences of learning to use eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy with people with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative study

“…1.3.1 | Clinician experience of using EMDR Cook et al (2009) found that clinicians' experience of an intervention can affect whether it is used again within a service. Studies have previously explored clinician experiences regarding the use of EMDR virtually (Bursnall et al, 2022), in different cultures (Hasandedic-Dapo, 2021), and with autistic individuals (Fisher et al, 2022). The aforementioned study by Unwin et al (2019) • What were clinicians' experiences of using EMDR with people with intellectual disabilities?…”

Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals towards Telepsychology during the Pandemic: A Pilot Study

“…For example, Downing et al [17] surveyed Australian psychologists' use of telepsychology during the COVID-19 crisis, gathering evidence to highlight potential shortcomings, such as the limited viewing area of a screen that reduces therapists' capacity to read and respond to their patient's body language, and the 'distortion' of the therapeutic atmosphere typically created in face-to-face therapy. Other studies, on the other hand, aimed to investigate whether specific therapeutic techniques, such as the chair technique, tele-chairwork [18], remote mindfulness [19,20], and internet-mediated eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) [21], could be applied fruitfully in the remote context. In addition, Fogler et al [22] adapted and administered a remote version of a brief parent training group targeting caregivers of school-aged children with ADHD.…”

Provision of online eye movement and desensitisation therapy (EMDR) for people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a multi-method service evaluation

“…Whilst results of these studies show promising results, the quality of the evidence for the effectiveness of online EMDR for PTSD is very low (Lenferink et al, 2020 ). Given the flexibility associated with online therapy, and therapists’ and patients’ interest in continuing to offer/receive online EMDR in the future (Bursnall et al, 2022 ), it is important for services to understand the potential benefits and acceptability of online EMDR.…”