2010
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.61.11.1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinician Perceptions of Virtual Reality to Assess and Treat Returning Veterans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since VRET has thus far remained a niche research area, there has been little research on implementation in regular care and very little research on how ordinary therapists view VRET. Research from 2010–2012 suggested that although therapists had an overall positive view of VRET (pros outweighing cons), there were also concern about required training, technical difficulties in operating, financial costs in acquiring, low immersion, and low efficacy, as well as a general unfamiliarity with the technology (Kramer et al, 2010; Segal et al, 2011; Schwartzman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since VRET has thus far remained a niche research area, there has been little research on implementation in regular care and very little research on how ordinary therapists view VRET. Research from 2010–2012 suggested that although therapists had an overall positive view of VRET (pros outweighing cons), there were also concern about required training, technical difficulties in operating, financial costs in acquiring, low immersion, and low efficacy, as well as a general unfamiliarity with the technology (Kramer et al, 2010; Segal et al, 2011; Schwartzman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the clinicians explain to participants and their families that an increase in symptoms is likely to occur at the beginning of treatment, veterans seem to see this increase in symptoms as evidence that the treatment is worsening their condition and may cause many to terminate treatment. A qualitative study of clinician perceptions of VRET found clinicians not trained in the use of VRET expressed concerns about the safety of using VRET with veterans, questioning whether the virtual environment would exacerbate the symptoms of veterans (Kramer et al, 2010). However, in their meta-analysis on the use of VRET with anxiety disorders, Powers and Emmelkamp (2008) conducted a meta-regression analysis which showed that an increase in the number of virtual reality treatment sessions yielded larger effects sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been high dropout rates in studies where participants are active duty service members (McLay et al, 2012), which could be attributed to difficulties in balancing treatment with military duties, the time commitment of treatment sessions (90-120 min twice weekly for 8-12 weeks), and the possibility of transfers to other military bases occurring mid-treatment. Kramer et al (2010) also note that the use of virtual reality technology as a form of treatment may cause the therapeutic alliance to suffer as a result. Therapists expressed concern that multitasking conducting therapy and controlling complex computer software would prevent the development of an effective therapeutic relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the fears of some counselors that it is ineffective (Kramer et al, 2010), telepsychology has already been successfully used to deliver behavioral interventions, psychological assessments, social skills train-ing, and session evaluations to rural populations, the elderly, and clients with thought disorders (Hynes et al, 2009;Reese, Slone, Soares, & Sprang, 2015;Tuerk, Yoder, Ruggiero, Gros, & Acierno, 2010). In addition, interventions implemented over the Internet have been shown to improve client outcomes for populations suffering from both depression and anxiety disorders (Glynn, Randolph, Garrick, & Lui, 2010;Hailey, Roine, & Ohinmaa, 2008) and eating disorders (Hailey et al, 2008;Shingleton, Richards, & Thompson-Brenner, 2013).…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%