Clinician perspectives on recovery and borderline personality disorder

Abstract

Purpose Recovery is an important concept within mental healthcare policy. There is a growing expectation that clinicians adopt approaches that align with the recovery principles, despite significant disagreements about what recovery-oriented interventions might look like in practice. It is also unclear how recovery may be relevant to personality disorder. This paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In total, 16 clinicians were interviewed at two mental health services in Melbourne, Australia. These clinicians had specialist training and experience in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and provided insight regarding the meaning and relevance of the recovery paradigm in the context of BPD. Thematic analysis within a grounded theory approach was used to understand key themes identified from the interview data. Findings Thematic analysis suggested that clinicians understand recovery in three distinct ways: as moving towards a satisfying and meaningful life, as different ways of relating to oneself and as remission of symptoms and improved psychosocial functioning. Clinicians also identified ways in which recovery-related interventions in current use were problematic for individuals diagnosed with BPD. Different approaches that may better support recovery were discussed. This study suggests that practices supporting recovery in BPD may need to be tailored to individuals with BPD, with a focus on cultivating agency while acknowledging the creative nature of recovery. Originality/value Clinicians are in a strong position to observe recovery. Their insights suggest key refinements that will enhance the ways in which recovery in BPD is conceptualized and can be promoted.

Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis

“…However, across a number of studies, clinicians questioned the use, meaning and validity of this diagnosis. They saw it as being associated with stigma, discrimination and exclusion from services, felt it could be difficult to ‘shake off’, and risked becoming “the person’s entirety” (47) .…”

“…When relationships went well, clinicians described successfully negotiating connection and distance in the therapeutic relationship: being open, warm and available, but also retaining boundaries, structure and a degree of emotional detachment. Clinicians spoke of a need to create a sense of shared responsibility for progress with service users, and of the value of adopting a curious, non-expert stance to help develop a safe space where strong emotions could be processed, tolerated and “radically accepted” (47) .…”

Using peer workers with lived experience to support the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study of consumer, carer and clinician perspectives

“…From a consumer perspective, recovery from BPD may involve symptom reduction, but also the generation of hope and participation in meaningful activities and relationships [5,6]. Services for consumers with BPD which focus on recovery oriented outcomes have been recommended [5,7]. In addition, carers who support consumers with BPD often experience high levels of stress and grief [8], and receive limited support for themselves [9].…”

An exploration of self-compassion and self-criticism in the context of personal recovery from borderline personality disorder

“…6 The process of recovery from BPD is complex and includes recognizing the need for change, 7 developing greater self-acceptance 8 and a stronger sense of agency. 9 Harsh self-criticism may impede this process by preventing individuals from taking action due to a harshly punitive self-concept.…”