Clinicians’ diagnostic accuracy of intimate partner relational problems and maltreatment: An international field study.

Abstract

Objective: Interpersonal partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive social and public health problem worldwide. In the context of the response by the World Health Organization to this issue, proposals were developed to improve the usefulness of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) descriptions for helping clinicians to reliably identify relational problems and maltreatment (RPM), including IPV, as part of clinical practice. This study focuses on factors associated with the accuracy of diagnostic decisions made by mental health professionals (MHPs) around the world when using the proposed ICD descriptions for RPM with standardized clinical vignettes in an ICD-11 internet-based field trial study. Method: A total of 1,221 MHPs from ninety countries evaluated randomly assigned vignettes, which described patients presenting with or without RPM and with or without a co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorder. Results: Findings showed that increased diagnostic accuracy for RPM was associated with MHPs being female or having greater knowledge/experience of RPM, as well as with the absence of a mental disorder in the patient. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of providing IPV-related training programs for MHPs to (a) better identify and address IPV in mental health settings and (b) improve knowledge and understanding of the consequences of IPV for physical and mental health.

AI-Generated Images in Vignette Studies: Benefits, Challenges, and a Python Template

“…They are widely used across various subfields of psychology, demonstrating their broad applicability. For instance, vignette studies assessed the accuracy of psychological diagnoses (Domínguez Martínez et al, 2024), the impact of social classes on diagnoses and treatments (Vlietstra et al, 2021), and the effects of corporate social responsibility (Paruzel et al, 2020) or leadership styles (Steinmann et al, 2020). Moreover, online microaggressions against LGBTQIA+ individuals (McInroy et al, 2024), the relationship between conspiracy beliefs and medical treatment preferences (Fournier & Varet, 2024), lay perceptions of narcissistic traits (Villalongo Andino et al, 2023), how group work fosters procrastination (Koppenborg et al, 2024), responsibility attributions concerning domestic violence (Leon & Aizpurua, 2024) or traffic accidents (Copp et al, 2023), victim blame regarding rape (Tomer & Guter, 2024) and accepting robots as job interviewers (Nørskov et al, 2020) or moral advisors (Arlinghaus et al, 2024;Straßmann et al, 2020) were also explored through vignettes.…”