2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicians didn't reliably distinguish between different causes of cardiac death using case histories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For diseases with high case fatality rates (for example, ALS and some cancers), mortality provides a reasonably complete and accurate indication of disease incidence. However, diagnostic information inferred from death certificates may be inaccurate for other outcomes, such as Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular disease and suicide 41 100. In addition, cases may go undetected or, if identified, may be inaccurately reported.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For diseases with high case fatality rates (for example, ALS and some cancers), mortality provides a reasonably complete and accurate indication of disease incidence. However, diagnostic information inferred from death certificates may be inaccurate for other outcomes, such as Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular disease and suicide 41 100. In addition, cases may go undetected or, if identified, may be inaccurately reported.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many CoDs had small case numbers, thereby requiring caution when drawing conclusions from absolute numbers. Additionally, previous research has found that the CoD information coded on death certificates lacks reliability when identifying the true underlying CoD [26,27]. Assuming non-differential misclassification of codes between the GP and the TSCI population, for the present study, relative estimates of mortality would likely be attenuated towards the null, so over-or under-estimation of mortality differ- Ref.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Second, we ascertained causes of recipient death without using an adjudication committee, and our findings must be interpreted cautiously. As others have shown, cause of death is difficult to assess reliably without the use of an adjudication committee [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%