Clinicians’ Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning

Abstract

Background Contraceptive care is a key element of reproductive health, yet only 12%-30% of women report being able to access and receive the information they need to make these complex, personal health care decisions. Current guidelines recommend implementing shared decision-making approaches; and tools such as patient decision aid (PtDA) applications have been proposed to improve patients’ access to information, contraceptive knowledge, decisional conflict, and engagement in decision-making and contraception use. To inform the design of meaningful, effective, elegant, and feasible PtDA applications, studies are needed of all users’ current experiences, needs, and barriers. While multiple studies have explored patients’ experiences, needs, and barriers, little is known about clinicians’ experiences, perspectives, and barriers to delivering contraceptive counseling. Objective This study focused on assessing clinicians’ experiences, including their perspectives of patients’ needs and barriers. It also explored clinicians’ suggestions for improving contraceptive counseling and the feasibility of a contraceptive PtDA. Methods Following the decisional needs assessment approach, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians recruited from the Society of Family Planning. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework informed the interview guide and initial codebook, with a specific focus on decision support and decisional needs as key elements that should be assessed from the clinicians’ perspective. An inductive content approach was used to analyze data and identify primary themes and suggestions for improvement. Results Fifteen clinicians (12 medical doctors and 3 nurse practitioners) participated, with an average of 19 years of experience in multiple regions of the United States. Analyses identified 3 primary barriers to the provision of quality contraceptive counseling: gaps in patients’ underlying sexual health knowledge, biases that impede decision-making, and time constraints. All clinicians supported the development of contraceptive PtDAs as a feasible solution to these main barriers. Multiple suggestions for improvement were provided, including clinician- and system-level training, tools, and changes that could support successful implementation. Conclusions Clinicians and developers interested in improving contraceptive counseling and decision-making may wish to incorporate approaches that assess and address upstream factors, such as sexual health knowledge and existing heuristics and biases. Clinical leaders and administrators may also wish to prioritize solutions that improve equity and accessibility, including PtDAs designed to provide education and support in advance of the time-constrained consultations, and strategic training opportunities that support cultural awareness and shared decision-making skills. Future studies can then explore whether well-designed, user-centered shared decision-making programs lead to successful and sustainable uptake and improve patients’ reproductive health contraceptive decision-making.

Evaluating the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Sexual Health–Focused Contraceptive Decision Aid for Diverse Young Adults: User-Centered Usability Study

“…Clinician interview data revealed the need to customize patient care to address and acknowledge identity complexity [ 20 ]. The solution materialized (through conversations with advisory panel members and the decision aid developer) with the About Me module.…”

“…Clinicians also shared discourse around potential solutions to challenges in contraceptive counseling, how decision aids can ameliorate barriers to care, and how we can implement suggested solutions with a health equity lens. Clinician interview data revealed the need to customize patient care to address and acknowledge identity complexity [20]. The solution materialized (through conversations with advisory panel members and the decision aid developer) with the About Me module.…”