2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinico-Pathological Discrepancies in the Diagnosis of Causes of Maternal Death in Sub-Saharan Africa: Retrospective Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundMaternal mortality is a major public-health problem in developing countries. Extreme differences in maternal mortality rates between developed and developing countries indicate that most of these deaths are preventable. Most information on the causes of maternal death in these areas is based on clinical records and verbal autopsies. Clinical diagnostic errors may play a significant role in this problem and might also have major implications for the evaluation of current estimations of causes of mater… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One factor that may have contributed to this increase is the misclassification of death due to HIV/AIDS that can occur in settings where there is a large number of undiagnosed HIV/AIDS cases, such as South Africa. 17 In this situation, using only the MMR for all-cause maternal deaths masks the greater increase in, and the growing problem of, the indirect causes of maternal death.…”
Section: South Africa 1998-2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor that may have contributed to this increase is the misclassification of death due to HIV/AIDS that can occur in settings where there is a large number of undiagnosed HIV/AIDS cases, such as South Africa. 17 In this situation, using only the MMR for all-cause maternal deaths masks the greater increase in, and the growing problem of, the indirect causes of maternal death.…”
Section: South Africa 1998-2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although verbal autopsy provides a broad syndromic approach, its performance for etiological diagnosis is very limited, and it tends to misclassify a substantial number of deaths [1]. Finally, clinical records generally show a high rate (10%–30%) of discordance with the results of CDAs [8,9], and this discordance further increases in resource-constrained settings, where the availability of ancillary diagnostic tests such as imaging or microbiological exams is scarce or suboptimal [10,11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings add to the work of others highlighting the knowledge gap on the causes of severe infectious syndromes in resource-limited settings. [38][39][40][41] Although the etiologic diagnoses elucidated in our cohort indicate a substantial proportion were pathogens that would not be responsive to ceftriaxone, among the agents we assessed for each clinical syndrome no agent would provide better empiric coverage than ceftriaxone. Additionally, as our analysis was retrospective and as none of the diagnostic tests performed is 100% sensitive, our results likely underestimate the proportion of patients with an etiologic diagnosis that was not detected but nonetheless would be responsive to ceftriaxone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%