2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Analysis of Microscopic Extension in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Defining Clinical Target Volume for Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous models suggested using a CTV margin of 9 mm. 30 The reduction in visible primary volume may not be representative of what happens to the microscopic disease: does it shrink with this volume or does it stay in the original location. Guckenberger et al 31 described two possible ways of dealing with microscopic disease, including infiltrative growth pattern or an expansive growth pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous models suggested using a CTV margin of 9 mm. 30 The reduction in visible primary volume may not be representative of what happens to the microscopic disease: does it shrink with this volume or does it stay in the original location. Guckenberger et al 31 described two possible ways of dealing with microscopic disease, including infiltrative growth pattern or an expansive growth pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grills et al [18] compared the extension of 35 lung tumors in preoperative CT scans with pathological findings. The diameter of the tumor was overestimated by 5.8 mm when the lung window was used and underestimated by 8.5 mm when the soft tissue window was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grills et al [26,27] reported a trend toward reduced local recurrence with SBRT compared to wedge resection (4% following SBRT versus 20% with wedge resection, P ¼ 0.07). No statistical difference was identified between outcomes with SBRT and wedge resection at 30 months, but overall survival was better with wedge resection (87% with wedge resection versus 72% with SBRT, P ¼ 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%