1977
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450070113010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Correlations in Diabetic Retinopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative studies further elucidated that that 31.6% (IQR, 21.2%-52.0%) of the white dots corresponded to microaneurysms, which appeared as hyperfluorescent dots on the FA images, and most white dots around the boundary of nonperfused areas corresponded to microaneurysms (Fig 3). [1921] The total number of white dots was correlated significantly with the number of white dots corresponding to microaneurysms on FA images ( ρ = 0.860, P <0.001) but not with the number of H/Ma on the SLO images ( ρ = 0.078, P = 0.505; Fig 4). We sometimes observed white dots with no definite findings on the FA or OCT images; these dots should be characterized in future studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparative studies further elucidated that that 31.6% (IQR, 21.2%-52.0%) of the white dots corresponded to microaneurysms, which appeared as hyperfluorescent dots on the FA images, and most white dots around the boundary of nonperfused areas corresponded to microaneurysms (Fig 3). [1921] The total number of white dots was correlated significantly with the number of white dots corresponding to microaneurysms on FA images ( ρ = 0.860, P <0.001) but not with the number of H/Ma on the SLO images ( ρ = 0.078, P = 0.505; Fig 4). We sometimes observed white dots with no definite findings on the FA or OCT images; these dots should be characterized in future studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous reports have described the various appearances of the microaneurysms, including whitish or reddish ones, which depended on the presence of red or white blood cells, the properties of the vascular walls, or the stages in fibrotic maturation. [1921, 24] Further evaluation using adaptive optics imaging may elucidate the relationship between the microaneurysms of different colors and the flow of blood components. [25] In addition, most whitish microaneurysms were in the areas with low capillary density or around the boundary between the typical nonperfused areas and the typical perfused areas, which prompted us to speculate that these white dots may be developed during capillary dropout, because the disrupted flow of blood components, including erythrocytes, may affect the color of the microaneurysms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Most knowledge regarding structure and localization of diabetic retinal microaneurysms is derived from histological and pathological studies. 5–10 These studies have shown that diabetic microaneurysms are incompetent vascular outpouchings of the macular capillary bed that primarily arise from the deep part of the inner retinal capillary plexus, 6, 7 and are located in the inner nuclear layer (INL) extending infrequently to the outer plexiform layer (OPL). 7,8 However, most histopathological studies have been based on trypsin digested retinal flat mounts with light microscopy or electron microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying the complex clinical manifestations of diabetic retinopathy are two fundamental abnormalities: increased retinal vascular permeability and progressive retinal vessel closure (2, 3). Digested retinal vasculature preparations from diabetic patients and animals characteristically show early pericyte loss which is followed by acellular capillary development and microaneurysm formation (4,5). The severity of these changes is associated with the degree of chronic hyperglycemia to which the diabetic retina has been exposed, but the mechanisms by which elevated glucose levels cause retinal damage are currently not known (6, 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%