2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer – An analysis of 2050 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
10
2
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
10
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, the use of breast MRI resulted in statistically significant more frequent cancer-free surgical margins in the case of ILC (79% versus 73%, p = 0.002), but not in the subgroup of invasive carcinoma NST (p = 0.39). In contrast to our results, Lai et al showed an overall increased risk of surgical margin involvement when breast MRI was omitted [18]. This could be explained, among other things, by the inclusion of patients diagnosed with DCIS only in the study of Lai et al in contrast to our cohort including patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer only.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our results, the use of breast MRI resulted in statistically significant more frequent cancer-free surgical margins in the case of ILC (79% versus 73%, p = 0.002), but not in the subgroup of invasive carcinoma NST (p = 0.39). In contrast to our results, Lai et al showed an overall increased risk of surgical margin involvement when breast MRI was omitted [18]. This could be explained, among other things, by the inclusion of patients diagnosed with DCIS only in the study of Lai et al in contrast to our cohort including patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer only.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained, among other things, by the inclusion of patients diagnosed with DCIS only in the study of Lai et al in contrast to our cohort including patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer only. Consequently, the percentages of radical surgical margins differed among the studies (88.7% [18] versus 83.9% in our study). This study has several strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Two GAS5 genetic variants rs145204276 and rs55829688 were detected in compliance with the data of International HapMap Project and previous study [28]. The polymorphism rs145204276 AGGCA/-was demonstrated to be located at the promoter region of lncRNA GAS5 and was associated with the progression of several cancers [28,29].…”
Section: Selection Of Gas5 Genetic Polymorphismssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Two GAS5 genetic variants rs145204276 and rs55829688 were detected in compliance with the data of International HapMap Project and previous study [28]. The polymorphism rs145204276 AGGCA/-was demonstrated to be located at the promoter region of lncRNA GAS5 and was associated with the progression of several cancers [28,29]. GAS5 genetic polymorphisms rs145204276 and rs55829688 were examined by ABI StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as well as delineated with SDS vers.…”
Section: Selection Of Gas5 Genetic Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…An increasing number of patients choose breast-conserving surgery, which could lead to more positive incision margins during the operation. [8][9][10] Therefore, the positive incision margin during operation has attracted increased attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%