2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
191
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
191
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Actigraph/computer science and applications is the most commonly used motion sensor in children and has a good reproducibility, validity and feasibility. 20 This particular type of PA assessment has been shown to be valid across different activities in 3-to 5-year old children, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r ¼ 0.82 between VO 2 (ml kg À1 min À1 ) and Actigraph counts/epoch. 21 The accelerometers were worn around the hip.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Actigraph/computer science and applications is the most commonly used motion sensor in children and has a good reproducibility, validity and feasibility. 20 This particular type of PA assessment has been shown to be valid across different activities in 3-to 5-year old children, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r ¼ 0.82 between VO 2 (ml kg À1 min À1 ) and Actigraph counts/epoch. 21 The accelerometers were worn around the hip.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Accelerometers measure acceleration of the body part to which they are attached (de Vries et al 2009). It is argued that acceleration of the body is directly proportional to the muscular forces generated, which relates directly to energy expenditure (Freedson and Miller 2000) although their ability to accurately estimate energy expenditure in young children is questionable (de Vries et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a number of assessments available for evaluating physical activity, such as self-administered questionnaires of physical activity, pedometers, accelerometers, and supervised cardio-vascular training programs [11,21,22]. However, each method has its own strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its reliability, validation, and application in measuring physical activeity in different population have been reported [10][11][12][13][14][15], the relationship between disease activity and energy expenditure measured by the RT3 accelerometer in SLE patients has not been previously established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%